CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 janvier 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s3AAE10DF { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s25B97BCD { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border:0.75pt solid #808080; border-collapse:collapse } .sF5C9E8B1 { height:46.3pt } .sD1CDDC62 { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s7BE5FA79 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .s26ADB50A { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .sFD306575 { height:35.55pt } .s2F4AF114 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s734752C4 { margin-left:13.34pt; padding-left:4.51pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; font-weight:bold } .s898DAE93 { border:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s41FDBC30 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:0.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-0.45pt; font-size:10pt } .sB71F2881 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sBCA334AF { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7CB6920E { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s62945D10 { border-top:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 14 January 2020   Published on 3 February 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 48352/19 Ykalo Solomon TEWELDE and others against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended) 1.     The applicants are Eritrean nationals. Their personal details and the information on the relevant domestic proceedings are set out in the appended table. 2.     The applicants are represented before the Court by Ms E. Davidyan, Ms D. Trenina and Mr K. Zharinov, lawyers practising in Moscow. 3.     The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 4.     On various dates the applicants, who either faced mandatory military or national service or were performing it, left Eritrea for Sudan. In 2018 they travelled to Russia using Fan IDs, which provided visa-free entry during the 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia. 5.     Subsequently on various dates they were apprehended by the Russian authorities for overstaying their visa-free period and the national courts ordered their administrative removals. The applicants’ allegations of risks under Article 3 of the Convention were dismissed as unsubstantiated. 6.     The applicants were placed in detention pending removal and are currently detained. 7.     The applicants’ refugee status and temporary asylum requests were dismissed by the Russian authorities. COMPLAINTS 8.     The applicants complain under Article 3 of the Convention that they would be exposed to a real risk of ill-treatment in case of their removal to Eritrea. 9.     They further complain under Article 5 §§ 1 (f) and 4 of the Convention that their detention pending removal is unlawful and that they have no access to an effective procedure for the review of their continued detention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     In respect of the applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention, did they exhaust the available domestic remedies by raising the relevant complaints in the administrative removal proceedings?   2.     Would the applicants face a real risk of being subjected to treatment in breach of Article   3 of the Convention in the event of their removal to Eritrea (see Chahal v. the United Kingdom , 15 November 1996, § 80, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ V)? The parties are invited to provide individual answers in respect of each applicant with reference to their individual circumstances.   3.     Were the applicants deprived of their liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention? Was their detention lawful within the meaning of Article   5 § 1 (f) of the Convention? Did they have access to a procedure allowing for judicial review of their continued detention as required by Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.   3455/05, §§ 162-64, ECHR 2009, and Chahal , cited above, §§   126-29)?   APPENDIX No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant name date of birth   Administrative removal proceedings   48352/19 15/10/2019 Ykalo Solomon TEWELDE 10/02/1995   Tesfamiryam Tekle MIRYAM 01/01/1992   Brhane Habtemichael BEILUL 12/07/1997   Mohammednur Siyed IDRIS 01/01/1990   Mr TEWELDE, Ms MIRYAM, Ms BEILUL   21 November 2018 –ordered by the Pechorskiy District Court of Pskov Region 28 December 2018 – upheld by the Pskov Regional Court   Mr IDRIS 24 October 2018 – ordered by the Pskov Town Court of Pskov Region 19 November 2018 – upheld by the Pskov Regional Court       48496/19 15/10/2019 Goitom Belay HABEN 14/05/1985   Welday Teklehaymanot HABTEAB 01/01/1985   21 November 2018 – ordered by the Pechorskiy District Court of Pskov Region 28 December 2018 – upheld by the Pskov Regional Court       48720/19 15/10/2019 Zereit Okibamichael TSGEWYIN 01/01/1994   21 November 2018 – ordered by the Pechorskiy District Court of Pskov Region 28 December 2018 – upheld by the Pskov Regional Court     48773/19 15/10/2019 Teklit Abraham ROBIEL 08/08/1987   Temnewo Mehari SEMERE 15/06/1986   Kidane Teklehaymanot GARBAY 02/09/1994   Habtetsion Veldeyhannes LWAM 28/07/1991   24 October 2018 – ordered by the Pskov Town Court of Pskov Region 19 November 2018 – upheld by the Pskov Regional Court