CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 janvier 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-201480
- Date
- 28 janvier 2020
- Publication
- 28 janvier 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Communicated on 28 January 2020 Published on 17 February 2020   FIRST SECTION Applications nos. 82623/17 and 83043/17 Ilias KANELLIS and Andreas PAPPAS against Greece and Maria VASILAKI and Emmanouil VASILAKIS against Greece lodged on 6 December 2017 and 6 December 2017 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern civil defamation proceedings instituted against the applicants, in their capacities as co-directors, editor and journalist of the magazine “The Athens Review Books”, following a publication of an article in June 2010. The article was criticising the allotment of the main amphitheatre of the Old Parliament House for the presentation of a book whose author was Mr. Kotzias, a Greek politician and professor at the university. The domestic courts considered the article defamatory and the proceedings ended with the applicants being ordered to pay damages in the amount of 10,000 euros. The applicants complain that the domestic courts’ judgments holding them liable for defamation constituted a disproportionate interference with their right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression contrary to Article   10 of the Convention due to them being ordered to pay damages following the publication of the impugned article?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 28 janvier 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-201480
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel