CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 11 février 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s39A7D870 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2A7D9A9F { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s6F543D01 { width:148.61pt; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Communicated on 15 September 2016 and 11 February 2020 Published on 17 February 2020   FIRST SECTION Application no. 32349/16 Dušan VUJNOVIĆ against Croatia lodged on 2 June 2016       The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.   QUESTIONS 1.     When exactly did the list of victims of the Operation Pocket-93 ( Medački džep ) attached to the indictment against general R.A. before the ICTY of 21 May 2001, and the list of victims attached to the amended indictment against that general of 26 November 2001, become publicly available and accessible to the Croatian public? You are required to submit material evidence in support of your statement.     2.     The Supreme Court’s case-law nos. Rev 812/09-2 of 16 February 2011; Rev 1449/11-3 of 25 February 2014; Rev 2617/11-3 of 11 March 2014; Rev-x 398/14-2 of 9 September 2014, and Rev 1917/13-3 of 12   January 2016 suggests that the damage under section 376(2) of the Civil Obligations Act related to the death of the plaintiffs’ family members occur to the plaintiffs, and the objective statutory limitation period for lodging a civil claim for damages starts to run, only on the date on which the plaintiffs actually learn about the death of their family members. In the light of this, the parties are invited to elaborate on the effect on the complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Supreme Court’s decision in the applicant’s case finding that the damage under section 376(2) of the Civil Obligations Act occurred, and the objective statutory limitation period started to run, on the date he had an objective possibility to learn about the death of his family members.