CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 7 février 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-201614
- Date
- 7 février 2020
- Publication
- 7 février 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } Communicated on 7 February 2020 Published on 24 February 2020   SECOND SECTION Application no. 7658/13 Constantin PLĂMĂDEALĂ against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 19 December 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant in which he had been accused of murder. It raises issues which are very similar to those examined in the case of Belcencov v.   the Republic of Moldova (no. 4457/09, 18 June 2019). The applicant was acquitted by the Court of Appeal but the acquittal judgment was later reversed by the Supreme Court of Justice in proceedings which took place in the applicant’s absence and without hearing anew evidence from witnesses. The applicant was sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. The applicant submitted that the proceedings before the Supreme Court had been unfair because he had not had the chance to appear in person before that court and because it had convicted him without hearing evidence from witnesses.   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention ( Belcencov v. the Republic of Moldova no. 4457/09, 18 June 2019)?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 7 février 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-201614
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel