CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 13 février 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-201711
- Date
- 13 février 2020
- Publication
- 13 février 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Communicated on 13 February 2020 Published on 02 March 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 46160/19 Bogdan-Gavrilă BUȘ against Romania lodged on 22 August 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns non-enforcement of a court order setting the contact schedule between the applicant and his two children. Following the couple’s divorce, the parents shared parental responsibility, the mother was awarded custody of the children and the applicant was granted contact rights with his children. According to the applicant, the mother opposed, in practice, any contact between father and children, claiming that the children refused to accompany him anywhere. The applicant argues that the mother has been alienating the children from him in a clear attempt to sever any relation between him and the children. Relying on Articles 6 § 1 and 8 of the Convention, the applicant complains that the domestic authorities failed to assist him in his efforts to see his children. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? In particular, have the authorities (bailiff’s office, police, domestic courts, and court-appointed psychologists) provided sufficient assistance to the applicant for the enforcement of the court decision granting him contact rights with his children (decision no. 11266 of 14 November 2016, by the Braşov District Court)?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 13 février 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-201711
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel