CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 février 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Communicated on 24 February 2020 Published on 16 March 2020   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 44801/13 Igor Romanovych GALAMAY against Ukraine lodged on 4 July 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention that he had not been advised of his right to a lawyer nor given access to a lawyer before and while the authorities were conducting certain investigative actions, including interviews, with him in the course of a criminal investigation concerning allegations of bribery. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and in light of the procedural guarantees afforded by Article 6 § 3 (c) of this provision? In particular was the applicant’s right to a lawyer respected in the course of the investigative actions conducted with him on 25 and 26   May 2011?