CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 mars 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s644D8EA5 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD2443AC5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:19.85pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-19.85pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } Published on 23 March 2020     THIRD SECTION Application no. 71772/17 K.O. against Russia and 4 others – see appended list     The facts and complaints in these applications have been summarised in the Court’s Statements of facts and Questions to the parties, which are available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS 1.     In the light of the general situation in their countries of origin and the applicants’ personal circumstances, would they face a risk of being subjected to treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention if the removal decisions against them were enforced (see F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, § 114, 23 March 2016)?   2.     Given the nature of the charges against the applicants, notably recruitment for and/or participation in terrorist organisations, do the applicants belong to a previously identified vulnerable group facing a real risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention (see e.g. K.I. v.   Russia , no. 58182/14, §§ 34-36, 7 November 2017)? Specifically, what is the position of the Prosecutor General’s Office, deciding on extraditions of persons wanted on terrorist charges, as to whether they belong to that group or the existence of the abovementioned risks under Article 3 of the Convention?   3.     Before deciding on the applicants’ removal, did the Russian authorities carry out an adequate and rigorous assessment of their claims about the risks of ill-treatment in their country of origin (see Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom , nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, § 214, 28 June 2011, and F.G. v. Sweden [GC], cited above, § 119)?   4.     If the applicants run a risk of ill-treatment in case of their removal, what measures (such as obtaining assurances from relevant governments) have been taken or could be envisaged by the Russian Government in order to mitigate that risk? APPENDIX List of applications   No. Application no. Case name Communicated on 1 71772/17 K.O. v. Russia 12/01/2018 and 02/03/2020 2 340/18 I.M. v. Russia 11/10/2018 and 02/03/2020 3 6646/18 M.Z. v. Russia 11/10/2018 and 02/03/2020 4 8103/18 S.D. v. Russia 03/09/2018 and 02/03/2020 5 18359/18 Y.M. v. Russia 03/09/2018 and 02/03/2020