CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 9 mars 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-202298
- Date
- 9 mars 2020
- Publication
- 9 mars 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFF075836 { margin-right:7.05pt; margin-left:7.05pt; border-collapse:collapse; } .sB5766D70 { height:46.65pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sA2B60CC5 { height:103.35pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF2D96D70 { height:45.85pt } Communicated on 9 March 2020 Published on 30 March 2020   FOURTH SECTION Applications nos. 6673/12 and 6682/12 Mikloš KOVAČ and Imre KOVAČ against Serbia and Boro NOVAKOVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 15 November 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern proceedings for judicial review of the applicants’ pre-trial detention ordered on suspicion of robbery and attempted murder. The domestic courts extended the applicants’ pre-trial detention without giving them the possibility to reply to the investigating judges’ written observations and without hearing the applicants or their representative. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the Court’s case law (see Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, 25 March 1999, and Idalov v. Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, 22   May 2012) were the reviews of the applicants’ pre-trial detention by the Supreme Court (decision of 24 December 2009) and the Novi Sad Court of Appeal (14 January, 13 April and 27 April 2010) in conformity with Article   5 § 4 of the Convention? APPENDIX   No. Application nos. Case name Lodged on Applicant Date of Birth Residence Nationality Represented by 1 6673/12 Kovač v. Serbia 15/11/2011 Mikloš KOVAČ 14/11/1967 Ada Serbian   Imre KOVAČ 05/06/1986 Ada Serbian Viktor JUHAS ĐURIĆ 2 6682/12 Novaković v. Serbia 15/11/2011 Boro NOVAKOVIĆ 10/12/1990 Subotica Serbian Viktor JUHAS ĐURIĆ  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 9 mars 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-202298
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel