CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 23 mars 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-202545
- Date
- 23 mars 2020
- Publication
- 23 mars 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sD1D5582E { width:87.22%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; border-collapse:collapse } .s501B3C1F { width:8.26%; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sDA3A90CC { width:22.94%; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA731BC40 { width:22.94%; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA3E87090 { width:8.26%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF9126CBC { width:22.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s15E4B588 { width:22.94%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2F2D8549 { width:8.26%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6E3FE080 { width:22.94%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-right:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9E5A08F7 { width:22.94%; border-top:0.75pt solid #949494; border-left:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 23 March 2020 Published on 18 May 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 1250/15 Nicolae BOLMANDÎR and Others against Romania lodged on 17 December 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the proceedings against the applicants on account of the domestic courts’ failure to, respectively, overturn the second, third and fourth applicants’ acquittal without a direct assessment of the relevant evidence, and to give an(y) answer to the applicants’ appeal concerning the criminal limb in so far as essential evidence was adduced in the case only at the end of the proceedings, as well as concerning the civil limb. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against them, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did the overturning by the appellate courts of the second, third and fourth applicants’ acquittal without a direct assessment of the evidence given by witnesses on whose statements they relied, impair the overall fairness of the proceedings?   2.     Were the applicants afforded adequate time and facilities to prepare their defence, as required by Article 6 § 3 (b) of the Convention, in connection with the allegedly essential evidence (“volume VI”) which was taken to the file only at the end of the appeal stage of proceedings?   3.     Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in view of the fact that the appellate court has not given any reply to their arguments concerning the civil limb of the proceedings?   APPENDIX List of 4 applicants No. Applicant’s name Birth date Nationality Place of residence 1 Nicolae BOLMANDÎR 03/09/1976 Romanian Constanţa 2 Daniel BALAN 21/03/1982 Romanian Constanţa 3 Adrian BOLMANDÎR 15/08/1977 Romanian Constanţa 4 Sorin CONDURACHE 29/03/1978 Romanian Constanţa  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 23 mars 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-202545
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel