CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 3 avril 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-203012
- Date
- 3 avril 2020
- Publication
- 3 avril 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4B163ECD { width:87.22%; border-collapse:collapse } .sE87BCA71 { width:8.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s7898AFFC { width:25.88%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s23BE0B9C { width:21.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sB8882FFD { width:8.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE140995B { width:25.88%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s990158F2 { width:21.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 3 April 2020 Published on 8 June 2020   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 50272/18 Roisin SHORTALL and Others against Ireland (see list attached) lodged on 11 October 2018 STATEMENT OF FACTS This application concerns the declaration to be made by the President of Ireland upon entering office (as prescribed by Article 12.8 of the Irish Constitution), and the declaration to be taken by all members of the Irish Council of State (as prescribed by Article 31.4 of the Irish Constitution), both of which must be sworn “in the presence of Almighty God”. Ms Shortall and Mr Brady are elected representatives in Dáil Éireann (the Lower House of Parliament in Ireland), Mr Norris is a member of Seanad Éireann (the Upper House of Parliament in Ireland), Mr Finlay is a former chief executive of Barnardos, a children’s charity, and Professor McConnell is the Chancellor of Trinity College Dublin and a professor of genetics. The applicants claim the declarations required by Article 12.8 and 31.4 of the Constitution exclude conscientious non-Christians, non-believers and those who do not wish to violate their consciences both from the office of President and from membership of the Council of State. The applicants claim that as prominent politicians and members of Irish civil society they can legitimately aspire to being elected to the office of President or to being appointed to the Council of State. The applicants claim that the requirements for religious declaration for these offices in the Constitution would either prevent them from taking up these offices or require them to make a religious declaration against their conscience. The applicants claim that their rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under Article 9 § 1 have been violated by the above requirements. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Can the applicants claim to be “victims”, within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention, of the alleged violations of Article 9 § 1 as a result of the requirement for the President of Ireland to make a religious declaration upon entering office under Article 12.8 of the Irish Constitution or as a result of the requirement for members of the Council of State to make a religious declaration under Article 31.4 of the Irish Constitution? 2.     Do the requirements of Articles 12.8 and 31.4 of the Irish Constitution breach the applicants’ rights under Article   9 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, ECHR   1999 ‑ I)? APPENDIX   No. Applicant’s Name Birth date Nationality Place of residence 1 Roisin SHORTALL 1954 Irish Dublin 2 John BRADY 1973 Irish Bray 3 Fergus FINLAY 1950 Irish Dublin 4 David MCCONNELL 1944 Irish Dublin 5 David NORRIS 1944 Irish Dublin  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 3 avril 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-203012
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel