CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 juin 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-203659
- Date
- 18 juin 2020
- Publication
- 18 juin 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 18 June 2020 Published on 6 July 2020   SECOND SECTION Application no. 42168/19 Nikita GANČO against Lithuania lodged on 29 July 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns alleged excessive length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant in which he was eventually acquitted. He instituted civil proceedings before domestic courts, claiming damages from the State for excessive length of the criminal proceedings (from 20   December 2010 to 16 May 2017), various procedural shortcomings, and restrictive measures taken during the pre-trial investigation, but his claim was dismissed. The courts acknowledged that the proceedings had been long and that the pre-trial investigation had not been “particularly intensive”, but stated that the case had been complex and of a large scale and that there had not been periods of complete inactivity. The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the excessive length of the criminal proceedings against him. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the length of the criminal proceedings in the present case in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §   186, 22   May 2012, and the cases cited therein)?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 18 juin 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-203659
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel