CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 6 juillet 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-204301
- Date
- 6 juillet 2020
- Publication
- 6 juillet 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 6 July 2020 Published on 27 July 2020   THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 56617/19 and 56637/19 Severi Karlovna GROMADSKAYA against Russia and Anton Vladimirovich BOLONIN against Russia lodged on 14 October 2019 and 11 October 2019 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the allegedly ineffective investigation into an attack on the applicants, a transgender homosexual man and a transgender person of non-binary gender, which was committed by an unknown man in a bar in St Petersburg on 14 October 2017. According to the applicants, the perpetrator approached them having seen a rainbow bracelet (symbol of LGBTI pride and social movements) on their friend. Then he insulted them referring to their alleged homosexuality and beat them up, inflicting several contusions. The applicants reported the incident to the 10 th police station in the Nevskiy District of St   Petersburg (“the police”), which opened administrative proceedings into the incident under Article 6.1.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences (“Battery”). Alleging that the attack had been motivated by hatred against LGBTI people the applicants sought a criminal case to be opened by the police. Several times the police refused to initiate criminal proceedings into the incident. It held that the attack had not amounted to a criminal offence. After several complaints had been lodged by the applicants’ lawyer with various domestic authorities, including the Nevskiy District Court in St   Petersburg, the police decisions not to open a criminal case were overruled by the deputy prosecutor in the Nevskiy District of St Petersburg for being premature and ill-founded. It appears that the criminal pre-investigation inquiry is still ongoing. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the authorities conduct an effective investigation into the attack of 14 October 2017 as required by Articles 3 and 8 taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention? In particular, did they investigate the existence of a hatred motive behind the act of violence (see   M.C. and A.C.   v. Romania , no.   12060/12, §§ 105-26, 12 April 2016)?   2.     Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their Convention complaints, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?   The Government are requested to submit a copy of the material related to the criminal pre-investigation inquiries and the administrative proceedings opened into the attack of 14 October 2017. List of the applicants No. Application no. Lodged on Case name Applicant Birth year Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1 56617/19 14/10/2019 Gromadskaya v.   Russia Severi Karlovna GROMADSKAYA 1984 St Petersburg Russian K.A. Mikhaylova   2 56637/19 11/10/2019 Bolonin v. Russia Anton Vladimirovich BOLONIN 1978 St Petersburg Russian  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 6 juillet 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-204301
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel