CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 9 septembre 2020

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFAC29D8B { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)173 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 23 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 September 2020 at the 1381 st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Date of the decision 12115/12 Ömer ADIGÜZEL 26/11/2019 5517/10 İhsan AKYAZ 08/10/2019 3690/11 Mehmet ANIL 22/10/2019 7281/13 Faruk AVCI 12/11/2019 54164/08 İhsan BARAN 08/10/2019 23639/11 Deniz BİLGİN 08/10/2019 2621/13 Nihat BULAK 26/11/2019 39389/10 Erdal ÇERİ 08/10/2019 42375/11 İbrahim DEMIR AND OTHERS 22/10/2019 49031/09 Ramazan ELALTUNTAŞ 12/11/2019 44111/18 Tevfik GAYRETLI 26/11/2019 17842/11 Zeki KARATAŞ 12/11/2019 16558/10 Ercan KILIÇ 26/11/2019 32867/09 Seyfettin KINAY 26/11/2019 44980/11 Hikmet KİRMİT AND OTHERS 24/09/2019 44166/12 Besime KONCA 24/09/2019 66695/12 Menderes LEYLA 24/09/2019 15023/09 Abdurrahman ÖZBILGIÇ 22/10/2019 76632/17 Hekber TAMER 08/10/2019 67148/09 Hamza YALÇIN AND Elif METİN POLAT 08/10/2019 3566/17 Muhsin YANAR AND 3 OTHER APPLICATIONS 24/09/2019 81779/12 Orhan YILDIRIM 08/10/2019 22081/10+ Zübeyde ZENGIN AND OTHERS AND Perişan BARAN AND OTHERS 12/11/2019   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in this case the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlement were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlement were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close its examination.