CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 septembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 14 September 2020 Published on 5 October 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 34804/17 A.B. against Russia lodged on 9 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s pending extradition to Turkmenistan where he allegedly faces a real risk of ill-treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     In the light of the general situation in Turkmenistan and the applicant’s personal circumstances, would he face a risk of   being subjected to treatment in breach of Article 3 of the Convention if extradited to his country of origin (see   F.G. v. Sweden   [GC], no.   43611/11,   §   114, 23 March 2016, and Allanazarova v. Russia , no. 46721/15, 14 February 2017)?   2.     Before deciding on the applicant’s extradition, did the Russian authorities carry out an adequate and rigorous assessment of his claim about the risks of ill-treatment in his country of origin (see Sufi and Elmi v.   the   United Kingdom , nos.   8319/07 and 11449/07, §   214, 28   June 2011, and F.G.   v.   Sweden   [GC], cited above,   §   119)?