CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 22 octobre 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-206135
- Date
- 22 octobre 2020
- Publication
- 22 octobre 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 22 October 2020 Published on 9 November 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 68977/17 Heinz WÖGERER against Austria lodged on 14 September 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil proceedings for damages. After his action had been dismissed by the Wels Regional Court the applicant appealed to the Linz Court of Appeal which dismissed his appeal and held that no further appeal was granted to the Supreme Court. Thereupon the applicant filed a request to the Court of Appeal for reconsidering its decision not to grant a further appeal, which was accompanied by a writ of appeal including a request for referral for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The Court of Appeal rejected the request with a brief reasoning. The applicant relies on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant leave for a further appeal which also contained a request for a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union render the proceedings unfair (see Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium , nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, §§ 59-62, September 2011, in particular; Harisch v. Germany , no. 50053/16, §§ 33-36, 11 April 2019; Sanofi Pasteur v. France , no. 25137/16, §§ 68-71, 13 February 2020)?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 22 octobre 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-206135
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel