CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 novembre 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-207151
- Date
- 30 novembre 2020
- Publication
- 30 novembre 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2A91C753 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 30 November 2020 Published on 21 December 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 28704/11 Laste APOSTOLOVSKI against Bosnia and Herzegovina and 15 others – see appended list SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants (in case no. 73993/13, the applicant’s late husband) were employed with the army of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (“SFRY”). Being stationed in the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina, they were allocated military flats there. Some of them purchased their flats shortly before the 1992-95 war (compare Đokić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , no. 6518/04, 27 May 2010), whereas the others did not (compare Mago and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina , nos. 12959/05 and 5 others, 3 May 2012). All of them left their flats when the war started and joined foreign armed forces. After the war, their restitution claims were rejected pursuant to section 3a of the Restitution of Flats Act 1998. The applicants claim that they have been neither allocated a military flat nor provided with a loan, co-financed by the military authorities, in any other successor State of the SFRY. On different dates, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found a violation of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their pre-war military flats. While reiterating that it was not disproportionate to reject restitution claims regarding military flats pursuant to section 3a of the Restitution of Flats Act 1998, the Constitutional Court held that those who had purchased their military flats before the 1992-95 war as well as those who had not, but who had not acquired a military flat in a successor State of the SFRY, must be given fair compensation. Only the applicant in case no. 28704/11 has not obtained such a decision. It would appear that none of the applicants have so far been given compensation in that respect. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention arising from the applicants’ inability to return to their pre-war homes? APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name 1 28704/11 Apostolovski v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 9544/12 Jakovljević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 45699/13 Knežević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 45812/13 Marković v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 45899/13 Miladinović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 45900/13 Kovačević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 7 48089/13 Lalić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 8 52879/13 Ivančić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 9 73993/13 Mutavdžić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 10 74240/13 Popović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 11 27385/14 Mandžo v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 12 62215/15 Bulatović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 13 17300/16 Cvetković v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 14 53625/16 Sigur v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 15 55327/16 Bogdanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina 16 36174/17 Prodanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 30 novembre 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-207151
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel