CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 avril 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sBF7240F3 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .sC1FC6E44 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .s9A052872 { width:96.88%; border-collapse:collapse } .sB71C1C6 { width:7.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sDC0DF6B6 { width:26.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD56DEDDB { width:28.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7277B24C { width:18.58%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5B02462B { width:19.06%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s274C830C { width:7.76%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s71C1B0B6 { width:26.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8FEFBDB { width:28.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7E2F6F42 { width:18.58%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s91FBDE34 { width:19.06%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6EDAE7A5 { width:7.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9D7E781C { width:26.56%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sBF28E724 { width:28.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDA068C08 { width:19.32%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s797EF7B3 { width:17.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s15D72D55 { width:7.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA5F721B2 { width:26.56%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s58ED0476 { width:28.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3DE4A319 { width:19.32%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF11AA5DE { width:17.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Published on 10 May 2021   THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 60288/19 and 60307/19 Jón Ásgeir JÓHANNESSON against Iceland and Tryggvi JÓNSSON against Iceland lodged on 17 November 2019 communicated on 19 April 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ request for the reopening of criminal tax proceedings against them, following the Court’s judgment in the case of Jón Ásgeir Jóhannesson and Others v. Iceland , no. 22007/11, 18   May 2017, wherein it found a violation of the applicants’ rights under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention. The applicants applied for the reopening of their criminal case to the Committee on the Reopening of Judicial Proceedings. By a decision of 12   April 2018, the Committee approved their request. Pursuant to the legislation applicable at the time of events, the Director of Public Prosecutions issued summons to the applicants and the case was heard by the Supreme Court on 8 May 2019. Prior to the hearing, the Supreme Court instructed the parties to address in their oral pleadings whether the conditions for reopening were fulfilled. By a judgment of 21 May 2019, the Supreme Court overruled the Reopening Committee and refused to reopen the case against the applicants. Its judgment found that domestic law did not grant an explicit right for reopening of judicial proceedings following the finding of a violation by a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, and furthermore that the details of the applicants’ case did not fulfil the general reopening criteria laid down in Section 228(1) of the Criminal Procedures Act No. 88/2008.   The applicants complain that the Supreme Court’s judgment violated their rights under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention. They also complain under Article 6 of the Convention that the refusal to reopen their cases violated their right to a fair trial .   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Does the Court have jurisdiction to consider the applicants’ complaint? In particular, did the proceedings which led to the 21 May 2019 judgment of the Supreme Court raise a new issue within the jurisdiction of the Court (see Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, §§   47-75, 11 July 2017, and the sources cited therein)?   2.     If yes, did the Supreme Court’s judgment of 21 May 2019 violate the applicants’ right to a fair trial under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, inter alia , Moreira Ferreira , cited above, §§   83-85, and the sources cited therein)?   3.     Did the applicants suffer a violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention (see, inter alia , A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11, §§ 131-134, 15 November 2016, and Tsonyo Tsonev v.   Bulgaria (no. 2) , no. 2376/03, §§ 53-55, 14 January 2010)?     APPENDIX   Application no 60288/19 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth/registration Nationality Place of residence 1. Jón Asgeir JÓHANNESSON 1968 Icelandic London     Application no 60307/19 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth/registration Nationality Place of residence 1. Tryggvi JÓNSSON 1955 Icelandic Reykjavik