CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mai 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Published on 25 May 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 4699/16 Gergely VIRTYÓ against Hungary lodged on 6 January 2016 communicated on 4 May 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the non-enforcement of the decisions relating to the applicant’s access rights in respect of his three children for over two years during the ongoing divorce proceedings and the subsequent non ‑ enforcement of the final judicial decision granting the applicant sole custody. The applicant invokes Article 8 of the Convention.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, as concerns the non-enforcement of the domestic decisions in his favour relating to access and custody of his children, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see Ónodi v. Hungary , no.   38647/09, 30   May   2017)?   2.     The parties are invited to inform the Court about any new developments of the case, notably about any decisions issued by the authorities in Hungary, and to submit copies thereof.