CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 mai 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-210638
- Date
- 25 mai 2021
- Publication
- 25 mai 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 14 June 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 14969/20 E.A. and H.A.A. against Greece and 5 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 25 May 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the living conditions of the applicants, pregnant women at the time of lodging the applications with the Court or mothers with their new-born babies. They lived either in tents in the forest outside Samos hotspot, or in a container inside the hotspot. The applicants requested interim measures under Rule 39 of the Court, which were granted (except for applicant no. 1 in application no. 43170/20). The applicants invoke Article 3 of the Convention. The applicants in applications nos. 14969/20, 17828/20, 24143/20 and 43170/20 also complain under Article 8 of the Convention and the applicants in applications nos. 17828/20 and 43170/20 further invoke Article 13 of the Convention. Lastly, several of the applicants complain that the Government have not implemented the interim measures ordered by the Court. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Having regard to the fact that the applicants were pregnant at an advanced stage or mothers with new-born babies, were their living conditions inside or near Samos hotspot compatible with Article 3 and/or Article   8 of the Convention?   2.     In respect of applications nos. 14969/20, 17182/20 (concerning adequate healthcare compatible with the first applicant’s state of health in view of the document from Samos hospital dated 31/01/2020) and 43170/20 (relating to applicant no. 4), having regard to the measures taken in response to the Court’s decisions to indicate interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, was there a hindrance by the State with the effective exercise of the applicants’ right of application, ensured by Article 34 of the Convention (see Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos.   46827/99 and 46951/99, §§   128-129, ECHR 2005 ‑ I)? Was there an objective impediment which prevented compliance with the Court’s interim measures? If so, did the Government take all reasonable steps to remove the impediment and to keep the Court informed of the situation (see Paladi v.   Moldova [GC], no.   39806/05, § 92, 10 July 2009, and Rrapo v.   Albania, no.   58555/10, § 75-88, 25 September 2012)?   3.     In respect of applicant no. 1 in application no. 17182/20, did she receive appropriate medical care for her health problems (epilepsy) in accordance with the requirements under Article 3 of the Convention?   4.     Did the applicants in applications nos. 17828/20 and 43170/20 have at their disposal an effective remedy as required under Article 13 of the Convention to complain about their living conditions?   APPENDIX   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Nationality Represented by 1. 14969/20 E.A. and H.A.A. v. Greece 24/03/2020 E.A. 1989 Syrian H.A.A. 2020 Syrian Jenny FLEISCHER 2. 17182/20 A.H. and K.A. v. Greece 24/04/2020 A.H. 1995 Syrian K.A. 2020 Syrian Ingrid METTON 3. 17828/20 R.A. and Y.A. v. Greece 22/12/2020 R.A. 1995 Syrian Y.A. 2020 Syrian Ingrid METTON 4. 24143/20 A.K. and J.N.S. v. Greece 22/06/2020 A.K. 1999 Ghanian J.N.S. 2020 Ghanian Jenny FLEISCHER 5. 31933/20 N.M. and X.M. v. Greece 30/07/2020 N.M. 1994 Congolese X.M. Congolese Ingrid METTON 6. 43170/20 Z.H. and Others v. Greece 01/10/2020 Z.H. 1998 Afghan   F.G. 1998 Afghan N.E. 1994 Congolese R.N. 2000 Congolese X.N. 2020 Congolese Ingrid METTON  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 25 mai 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-210638
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel