CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 mai 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } Published on 14 June 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 483/10 Stanislav Nikolayevich LUTSENKO against Ukraine lodged on 11 August 2009 communicated on 9 November 2016 and 25 May 2021   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS 1.     Given the manner in which the applicant was treated by the prison authorities after the delivery of the Court’s judgment in case no. 30663/04, was there an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2?   2.     Were the applicant’s rights under Article 8 of the Convention restricted for the purposes other than those prescribed in it, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention?