CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 juin 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4954B46 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:28.35pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .sA1463580 { width:121.66%; border-collapse:collapse } .s517185C0 { width:6.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s85AC135D { width:32.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2B283C67 { width:21.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sCB3BF08F { width:14.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC590A1FB { width:25%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA23B2570 { width:6.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF133FDD3 { width:32.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAC38887 { width:21.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .s296A656D { width:14.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s30ADBAC4 { width:25%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Published on 12 July 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 24501/19 Šimun ROMIĆ and Others against Croatia lodged on 23 April 2019 communicated on 24 June 2021   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns deprivation of property arising from the Government Decision of 23 September 1999 on the restructuring and recovery of Croatia Bank depriving the bank’s shareholders, including the applicants, of their shares, and the lack of access to court in that regard.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Were the applicants able to effectively challenge the Government Decision of 23 September 1999 on the restructuring and recovery of Croatia Bank before the domestic courts? If not, has there been a violation of the applicants’ right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Project-Trade d.o.o. v. Croatia , no. 1920/14, §§ 62-74, 19   November 2020)?   2.     Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1? In particular, was the Government Decision of 23 September 1999 accompanied by sufficient procedural guarantees against arbitrariness and thus lawful within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Project-Trade d.o.o. v. Croatia , no. 1920/14, §§ 75-88, 19 November 2020)?                                                       APPENDIX     No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality Place of residence 1. Šimun ROMIĆ 1947 Croatian Županja 2.   BABOGREDAC D.O.O. 1996 Croatian Babina Greda 3. Radenka BENAKOVIĆ 1954 Croatian Zupanja 4. Danijela BILIĆ 1972 Croatian Županja 5. Dalibor BRAJKOVIĆ 1969 Croatian Slavonski Brod 6. Mirta BRAJKOVIĆ 1973 Croatian Slavonski Brod 7. Terezija BRAJKOVIĆ 1943 Croatian Slavonski Brod 8. Stjepan ČOVIĆ 1945 Croatian Zupanja 9. Ivan DELIĆ 1951 Croatian Babina Greda 10. Ivka FILIPOVIĆ 1951 Croatian Zupanja 11. Ivan GRGIĆ 1974 Croatian Drenovci 12. Nada HEKLI 1964 Croatian Posavski Podgajci 13. Zvonko IVANKOVIĆ 1961 Croatian Zupanja 14. Dina KUZMAN 1988 Croatian Brezovica 15. LJEKARNE BATURINA ŽUPANJA 1996 Croatian Zupanja 16. Ljubica MATIJEVIĆ 1926 Croatian Posavski Podgajci 17. Ignac MATOČEC 1942 Croatian Đurđevac 18. Nada MILAKOVIĆ 1956 Croatian Zupanja 19. Dragan MISIR 1936 Croatian Posavski Podgajci 20.   NARCOR D.O.O. 1996 Croatian Zupanja 21. Verica PEJAKIĆ 1960 Croatian Drenovci 22. Ela PUŠKARIĆ 1996 Croatian Zupanja 23. Silva PUŠKARIĆ 1960 Croatian Zupanja 24. Tihomir RAMLJAK 1953 Croatian Županja 25. Tunjo ŠARIĆ 1958 Croatian Drenovci 26. Jakša ŠESTIĆ 1954 Croatian Racinovci 27. Dražen ŠTIVIĆ 1963 Croatian Zupanja 28. Nikola TUFEGDŽIĆ 1955 Croatian Soljani 29. Ninoslav ŽIVKOVIĆ 1968 Croatian Stitar