CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 6 juillet 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 26 July 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 25930/20 Ivan ZOBEC against Croatia lodged on 9 June 2020 communicated on 6 July 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was found guilty of causing a road traffic accident and leaving the scene in summary minor offence proceedings. He complains, under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention, about the overall fairness of the trial, in particular that he was unable to question a witness against him and that the trial court refused to hear a witness on his behalf. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, were his rights to defend himself and to cross-examine witnesses secured in the summary minor-offence proceedings against him, as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) of the Convention (cf. Marčan v.   Croatia , no. 40820/12, 10 July 2014; Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no.   36658/05, 18 December 2018)?