CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 juillet 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s5E8F5A28 { margin-top:14pt; margin-left:25.5pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4954B46 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:28.35pt; text-align:justify } .s6C3B0BAF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:28.35pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 16 August 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 47282/15 Roman Ivanovych TSARENKO against Ukraine and 3 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 27 July 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern allegations of police ill-treatment with a view to forcing the applicants to give self-incriminating statements and the lack of effective domestic investigation in respect of the aforementioned allegations. In addition to that two applicants also raise further complaints. More specifically, Mr   D.   Leontyev (application no.   43612/16) complains about the conditions of detention in Zaporizhzhya pre-trial detention facility (SIZO), lack of effective remedies with respect to the relevant complaints, and the length of criminal proceedings against him. Mr   K. Kononov (application no.   48768/16) complains about the duration of his detention during investigation and trial of his criminal case and the length of the criminal proceedings against him.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Questions in respect of all applications 1.     Have the applicants been subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention?   2.     Having regard to the procedural protection from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, (see paragraph   131 of Labita v.   Italy [GC], no.   26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV and Kaverzin v. Ukraine , no.   23893/03, §§   169-182, 15   May   2012), was the investigation of the applicants’ relevant complaints by the domestic authorities compatible with the requirements of Article   3 of the Convention? Additional questions in respect of application lodged by Mr   D.   Leontyev (no.   43612/16) 1.     Did the conditions of the applicant’s detention in the Zaporizhzhya SIZO between 04   June   2019 and 8   September   2019 amount to inhuman or degrading treatment?   2.     Was the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention?   3.     Did the applicant have an effective remedy for his complaint under Article   3 concerning the conditions of his detention, as required by Article   13 of the Convention? Additional questions in respect of application lodged by Mr   K.   Kononov (no.   48768/16) 1.     Was the length of the applicant’s detention pending investigation and trial in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   5 §   3 of the Convention?   2.     Was the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention?   APPENDIX Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Alleged ill-treatment Other relevant facts 47282/15 Tsarenko v.   Ukraine 31/08/2015 Roman Ivanovych TSARENKO 1986 Osytnyashka Ukrainian 01/11/2014 Officers of the Novomyrgorodskyy district police Abrasions (chest, neck, back)   26815/16 Petrakovskyy v.   Ukraine 30/04/2016 Dmytro Igorovych PETRAKOVSKYY 1994 Moscow Ukrainian 21/02/2011 Officers of the Khortytskyy district police in Zaporizhzhya Soft tissue oedema (occiput); abrasions (upper lip, right shoulder, left hand)   43612/16 Leontyev v. Ukraine 10/04/2016 Dmytro Ivanovych LEONTYEV 1986 Makoshyne Ukrainian 19/02/2014 Officers of the Yakymivka town police Abrasions (left ear, left hand, right leg and arm) Conditions of detention: 04/06/2019-08/09/2019 Zaporizhzhya SIZO allegedly cramped, insanitary environment; toilet not separated from living quarters; worn-off linen and bedding; food of unacceptable quality   Duration of criminal proceedings: 19/02/2014 – pending (as of 20/02/2020) Three levels of jurisdiction 48768/16 Kononov v.   Ukraine 13/08/2016 Kostyantyn Sergiyovych KONONOV 1983 Dnipro Ukrainian 27/02/2012 Officers of the Krasnogvardiyskyy district police in Dnipropetrovsk Haematoma (forehead); bruise (left eye); abrasions (hands) Duration of pre-trial detention: 27/02/2019-10/07/2014 (conviction); 07/07/2016 (conviction quashed on appeal) -10/01/2018 (conviction)   Duration of criminal proceedings: 27/02/2012 – 18/09/2019 Three levels of jurisdiction