CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 10 septembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 27 September 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 10419/20 Ufuk SERLİ against Turkey lodged on 31 January 2020 communicated on 10 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer. The applicant was detained in prison at the time of lodging this application. Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicant alleges that a court judgment transmitted by his lawyer and pronounced in a case similar to his own, was seized by the prison administration. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his correspondence with his lawyer, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, for instance,   Campbell v. the United Kingdom ,   25 March 1992, §§   32 ‑ 54, Series A no. 233 and Ekinci and Akalın v. Turkey , no. 77097/01, §   47, 30 January 2007)?