CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 16 septembre 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4CDBBA1E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sB7FB9D9B { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s70B41AB9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s790D6B17 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s256014D3 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s309031D4 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s1A61A404 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)200 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 21 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 16 September 2021 at the 1411 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 18899/19 ALBUL AND OTHERS 18/06/2020 18/06/2020 61109/10 BALAKIREV AND OTHERS 11/07/2019 11/07/2019 29432/08 BALANDINA AND ANDREYKO 20/07/2017 20/07/2017 69816/13 BEZBORODOV AND OTHERS 12/10/2017 12/10/2017 16108/03 CHUKANOV 08/12/2016 08/12/2016 10288/07 DUDYK 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 52234/18 KASYANENKO 16/07/2020 16/07/2020 40213/13 KONOROY AND GRYTA 29/03/2018 29/03/2018 18282/18 KOSTYUKOV 21/02/2019 21/02/2019 25732/05 KRIVOVA 09/11/2010 11/04/2011 11944/05 LIPISVITSKA 12/05/2011 12/05/2011 55109/08 LITVINYUK 01/03/2018 01/03/2018 17262/07 NAKONECHNYY 26/01/2012 26/01/2012 8237/06 PAVLOV 05/11/2015 05/11/2015 19019/18 RUDYY 11/04/2019 11/04/2019 9749/11 SAKHANENKO 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 2592/07 SEREBRYAKOVA AND OTHERS 20/10/2016 20/10/2016 10494/18 SHUMELNA 21/02/2019 21/02/2019 7192/04 SOKOLOV 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 4043/08 YEROKHIN 30/11/2017 30/11/2017 53967/07 ZHURAVEL AND OTHERS 20/12/2016 20/12/2016   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect (violations of Articles 6, paragraph 1, and 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required: -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see DH-DD(2019)1151 and DH-DD(2021)689 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the criminal/civil proceedings have been terminated; noting in that respect that the internal judgment debts were also paid to the applicant in the case of Balandina and Andreyko ;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined in the framework of the Merit and Svetlana Naumenko groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   Noting also that questions related to the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions, mostly delivered against the State and State-owned or controlled entities, and to the lack of an effective remedy in this respect, raised by the   Balandina and Andreyko c ase, are being examined by the Committee in the context of the supervision of the   Zhovner /   Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov   group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed below as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.