CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 22 septembre 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-212591
- Date
- 22 septembre 2021
- Publication
- 22 septembre 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 October 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 27178/21 Aza KADZANAIA against Georgia lodged on 19 May 2021 communicated on 22 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the length of the criminal proceedings which the applicant joined as a civil party based on the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1998 (no longer in force) to claim damages in relation to a robbery. The proceedings were initiated on 19 November 1998 and ended with the acquittal of the individual charged with the applicant’s robbery on 21   January 2021. Relying on Article   6 of the Convention, taken separately and in conjunction with Article   13, the applicant complains about the length of the relevant proceedings and the absence of an effective domestic remedy in that respect. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Is Article 6 § 1 of the Convention applicable under its civil head (see Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v.   Romania [GC], no.   41720/13 , §   194, 25   June 2019, and Codarcea v.   Romania , no. 31675/04, §   78, 2   June 2009)?   2.     Was the length of the relevant proceedings in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?   3.     Did the applicant have at her disposal an effective domestic remedy for her complaint under Article   6 §   1 of the Convention about the length of proceedings, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 22 septembre 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-212591
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel