CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 février 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 October 2021   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 33515/16 T.M. and S.Y.M. against the Netherlands lodged on 8 June 2016 communicated on 18 February 2019 The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Subject Matter of the case and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Does the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case of LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (10   June 2021, C-921/19) give the Government cause to proceed to a reconsideration of the issues at stake in the present case?   2.     What, if any, indications exist in the materials submitted to the Court in support of the Government’s argument ‑ put forward in their observations (§§ 139-140) but not raised in the national proceedings ‑ that the second applicant might be a Christian by birth?