CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 septembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase }   Published on 18 October 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 55788/20 Dávid KRÁTKY against Slovakia and 3 others – see appended list communicated on 23 June 2021 and 28 September 2021   The facts and complaints in these applications have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS 1.     Was the length of the applicants’ detention in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention? In particular, in light of the most recent decisions of 24 July 2020 and 11   August 2020, did the domestic courts provide relevant and sufficient reasons justifying the applicants’ continued detention and did the competent authorities display special diligence in the conduct of the criminal proceedings against the applicants (see Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, §§ 84-91, 5 July 2016; Petrov v. Slovakia , no.   64195/10, § 55, 2 December 2014; and Kuc v. Slovakia , no. 37498/14, §§ 50-60, 25 July 2017)?     2.     Did the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court no.   II. ÚS 129/2021, in which the applicants sought to challenge the lawfulness of their detention, comply with the “speed” requirement of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Žúbor v. Slovakia , no. 7711/06, §§   89 ‑ 90, 6 December 2011)?   APPENDIX No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Nationality Represented by 1. 55788/20 Krátky v. Slovakia 15/12/2020 Dávid KRÁTKY 1991 Slovak Michal Mandzák 2. 8058/21 Krátky v. Slovakia 28/01/2020 Dominik KRÁTKY 1991 Slovak Marek PARA 3. 21850/21 Krátky v. Slovakia 21/04/2021 Dominik KRÁTKY 1991 Slovak Marek PARA 4. 22074/21 Krátky v. Slovakia 21/04/2021 Dávid KRÁTKY 1991 Slovak Michal Mandzák