CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 30 septembre 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-212658
- Date
- 30 septembre 2021
- Publication
- 30 septembre 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .s5B8CBD11 { width:86.42%; border-collapse:collapse } .s18E818F5 { width:8.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD370BC15 { width:21.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD7994112 { width:30.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s42589970 { width:20.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s43BBA721 { width:18.02%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s94971193 { width:8.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE5EED0ED { width:21.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5B3C04F3 { width:30.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1467DF41 { width:20.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEF84E461 { width:18.02%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDC175EC3 { width:21.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7B2F5709 { width:18.42%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s1733C187 { width:21.44%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7441F921 { width:18.42%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Published on 18 October 2021   SECOND SECTION Applications nos. 16546/19 and 19394/19 Maşallah KORKMAZ against Turkey and Ahmet Muhammed DEMIRCI against Turkey lodged on 12 March 2019 and 27 March 2019 respectively communicated on 30 September 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the imposition on the applicants, detained in a prison at the time of events, of disciplinary sanctions, consisting respectively of a ban from participating in social activities for two months and of restriction of communications by phone for one month, on the ground that they had spoken to people other than the one person they were allowed to speak on the phone by prison authorities. Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants complain about the sanction inflicted on them. They argue that the disciplinary sanctions had no legal basis and the act for which they were sanctioned was not regulated as a disciplinary offence in the relevant legislation. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been an interference with the applicants` rights to respect for their private and family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention on account of the disciplinary penalties imposed on them?   2.     If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary, within the meaning of Article 8 § 2 of the Convention? APPENDIX Application no 16546/19 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth/registration Nationality Place of residence 1. Maşallah KORKMAZ 1985 Turkish Manisa     Application no 19394/19 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth/registration Nationality Place of residence 1. Ahmet Muhammed DEMİRCİ 1987 Turkish Edirne    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 30 septembre 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-212658
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel