CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 novembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4A10E7A5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; line-height:12pt } .s5FFF0A75 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sD37F5C3B { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .s64CDEC6 { width:108.1%; border-collapse:collapse } .s2FCE6CFC { width:8.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sC0A44D6F { width:32.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s271C2E3F { width:12.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD7065E50 { width:19.04%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sBB8173A1 { width:27.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC2D0AC95 { width:8.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sB2E17346 { width:32.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7C4FD47 { width:12.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA859EB77 { width:19.04%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9BB581CA { width:27.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s79EE79F9 { width:32.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s312FC76A { width:12.12%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5B02462B { width:19.06%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF9ABD3A0 { width:32.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2D167A61 { width:12.12%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s91FBDE34 { width:19.06%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 22 November 2021   THIRD SECTION Applications nos. 28852/20 and 51676/20 Sergey Sergeyevich BOYKO and Irina Mikhaylovna KUKLYAK against Russia and Anastasiya Valeryevna STARODUBOVSKAYA against Russia lodged on 25 June 2020 and 2 November 2020 respectively communicated on 2 November 2021   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern searches of the applicants’ homes. The applicants were not the suspects of the criminal investigation within the framework of which the searches had been carried out.     COMMON QUESTION TO THE PARTIES 1.     As regards the searches of the applicants’ homes, did the interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private life, home and correspondence pursue a legitimate aim, was it “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society” as required by Article 8 of the Convention? CASE SPECIFIC QUESTION 2.     Application no. 51676/20 : Was the search performed in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Article 8 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary to Article 18 of the Convention (see Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, §§   287 ‑ 317, 28 November 2017 and, mutatis mutandis , Aliyev v.   Azerbaijan , nos.   68762/14 and 71200/14, §§ 211-216, 20   September   2018)?   APPENDIX   Application no 28852/20 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality Place of residence 1. Sergey Sergeyevich BOYKO 1974 Russian Oktyabrskiy, Moscow Region 2. Irina Mikhaylovna KUKLYAK 1984 Russian Balashikha, Moscow Region     Application no 51676/20 No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth Nationality Place of residence 1. Anastasiya Valeryevna STARODUBOVSKAYA 1995 Russian Moscow