CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 3 novembre 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sACBC61AB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s598389F7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:10pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s1E925837 { margin-left:13.34pt; padding-left:4.51pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } Published on 22 November 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 14401/14 Sergiy Valentynovych CHUB against Ukraine and 4 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 3 November 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the annulment of their property titles or lease rights to plots of land or a flat, which they received from the local authorities or bought or inherited from private individuals who in turn had received them from the local authorities, following a “protest” or claims against them lodged by local prosecutors or authorities. The domestic courts ruled against the applicants finding, inter alia , that: in deciding to transfer a plot of land to the applicant the local authorities had exceeded their powers (application no. 14401/14); the applicant as a foreign national had failed to alienate an agricultural plot of land, which he had inherited from his mother, within one year after the inheritance, as required by domestic law (no. 14793/14); the local authorities’ decision to transfer a flat to the applicant had breached another individual’s rights to use that flat and the applicant had allegedly used her right to a privatisation of property and had not allegedly been on a list of persons requiring housing (no. 57149/14); the local authorities had leased a plot of land to the applicant company in breach of domestic law (no. 64284/14); and that the local authorities had exceeded their powers in transferring two plots of land to a private individual, one of which was later sold to the applicant (no. 64351/14). No compensation was offered to the applicants.   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1? If so, was it in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim in the public interest, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicants?   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of birth Place of residence Nationality Represented by Final domestic decision     14401/14 Chub v. Ukraine 07/02/2014 Sergiy Valentynovych CHUB 1958 Cherkasy Ukrainian - 21 November 2013, Higher Specialised Civil and Criminal Court   14793/14 Lobko v. Ukraine 10/03/2014 Viktor Alekseyevich LOBKO 1957 Monchegorsk Russian - 2 December 2013, Higher Specialised Civil and Criminal Court   57149/14 Lupashku v. Ukraine 11/08/2014 Irina Leonidovna LUPASHKU 1956 Berezivka Ukrainian - 19 February 2014, Higher Administrative Court   64284/14 Vest Ist Grup, TOV v. Ukraine 11/09/2014 VEST IST GRUP, TOV 2000 Kyiv Ukrainian Volodymyr Anatoliyovych LYSENKO 1 April 2014, Higher Commercial Court   64351/14 Vitse v. Ukraine 16/09/2014 Filipp Andre Sadi VITSE 1955 Costa de Caparica French Volodymyr Yuriyovych POLATAY 19 March 2014, Higher Specialised Civil and Criminal Court