CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 2 décembre 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCCB68666 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)334 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 17 cases against the Russian Federation   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2021 at the 1419 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 5945/04 FURMAN 05/04/2007 05/07/2007 2686/06 KALUGINA 21/06/2016 21/06/2016 26920/09 KARPESH 14/03/2017 14/03/2017 22094/05+ KIM AND RYNDINA 17/01/2017 17/01/2017 24842/04 KLETSOVA 12/04/2007 10/12/2007 31276/02 KOLYADA 30/11/2006 28/02/2007 23304/05 KONOVALOVA 08/03/2016 08/03/2016 724/06+ LEGLER AND MARYIN 30/11/2017 30/11/2017 39483/05 LISEYTSEVA AND MASLOV 09/10/2014 09/01/2015 33548/04 LYATSKAYA 18/09/2008 18/12/2008 3046/03 SHLEPKIN 01/02/2007 09/07/2007 8363/03 VERETENNIKOV 12/03/2009 12/06/2009 21769/03 VELSKAYA 05/10/2006 05/01/2007 39678/03 VORONKOV 30/07/2015 30/10/2015 1387/04 YERSHOVA 08/04/2010 04/10/2010 19065/08+ YUDIN AND OTHERS 19/07/2016 19/07/2016 42389/02 ZHUK 14/11/2008 06/07/2009   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the failure or serious delay in enforcing the domestic judicial decisions imposing obligations on the State unitary enterprises and municipal unitary enterprises (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (violations of Article 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the domestic judicial decisions were enforced, or the debts arising out of those decisions were converted into just satisfaction awards in respect of pecuniary damage and were paid as such;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these cases continues to be examined within the framework of the Gizzatova group of cases (Application No. 5124/03) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.