CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 2 décembre 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE38C928A { margin-right:7.05pt; margin-left:7.05pt; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse; } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCCB68666 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)336 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 15 cases against the Russian Federation   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2021 at the 1419 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)       Application No. Case Title Judgment of Final on 18682/09+ BORISENKO AND OTHERS 24/11/2016 24/11/2016 37042/14 CHAYKA 13/06/2017 13/06/2017 33128/08 FARRAKHOV 24/07/2018 24/07/2018 24185/08+ GEVAL AND OTHERS 04/05/2017 04/05/2017 72885/10 KOLESIN 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 61513/14 KONDRATYEV 22/06/2017 22/06/2017 10932/06 MEDVEDEV 03/10/2017 03/10/2017 49998/17+ OGLY AND OTHERS 26/07/2018 26/07/2018 28563/17+ PRISHCHENKO 26/11/2020 26/11/2020 31796/10 REVTYUK 09/01/2018 09/04/2018 13541/06 SHKILEV 19/03/2009 19/06/2009 10341/07 SNYATOVSKIY 13/12/2016 13/03/2017 41509/06 STADNIK 13/06/2017 13/06/2017 46144/12 TERENINA 24/11/2016 24/11/2016 4672/19+ TYAZHKOV 26/11/2020 26/11/2020 The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the various irregularities regarding detention on remand, the excessive length and the poor conditions of detention on remand, the excessive length of criminal proceedings, and the poor conditions of detention at a police station (violations of Articles 3, 5 and 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants are no longer held in detention on remand or at a police station, and the impugned criminal proceedings have been terminated;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these cases continues to be examined within the framework of the groups of cases Klyakhin , Kalashnikov , and Fedotov , and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in required;   Recalling further that the general measures in relation to the excessive length of criminal proceedings were examined in the Smirnova group of cases closed by Final Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)168 ;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.