CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 2 décembre 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC171EB59 { font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDD7C59DF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s2E49B105 { background-color:#ffffff } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sFAC29D8B { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s30AC1F85 { font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super } Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)430 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Sukachov, Nevmerzhitsky group, Yakovenko group and Melnik group v. Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 2 December 2021 at the 1419 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application Case Judgment of Final on 14057/17 SUKACHOV 30/01/2020 30/05/2020 54825/00 NEVMERZHITSKY (List of cases CM/Notes/1419/H46-43-app ) 05/04/2005 12/10/2005 15825/06 YAKOVENKO 25/10/2007 25/01/2008 28253/11 TYMCHENKO 27/05/2021 27/05/2021 72286/01 MELNIK 28/03/2006 28/06/2006 11773/08 TKACHEV 19/04/2018 19/04/2018 19585/18 SYENIN 21/02/2019 21/02/2019 34697/04 DOLGIKH 11/07/2019 11/07/2019 19591/18 PETROV AND KOROSTYLYOV 11/07/2019 11/07/2019 6128/12 RODZEVILLO 17/12/2019 17/12/2019 34745/19+ PARAMUSHCHAK AND SHPAKOVSKYY 10/12/2020 10/12/2020 59753/19+ VYSOTSKYY AND OTHERS 25/02/2021 25/02/2021   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Recalling that the structural problems revealed by these cases, notably overcrowding and poor material conditions of detention and the lack of effective remedies thereof, have been pending before the Committee since 2005, and that the Court has since adopted 110 judgments revealing various aspects of these problems;   Recalling further that the Committee has, in its interim resolution of 2018, called upon the authorities to act on their commitment to resolve the problems linked to conditions of detention and, therefore, establish, as a matter of priority,   effective domestic remedies for allegations of ill-treatment on account of   overcrowding, poor material conditions and insufficient medical care in detention;   Having regard to the pilot judgment of the Court in the case of Sukachov v. Ukraine , final on 30 May 2020, indicating that the respondent State must take measures aimed at reducing overcrowding and improving material conditions of detention, and introduce preventive and compensatory remedies by 30 November 2021;   Noting that certain steps have been taken by the Ukrainian authorities to improve conditions of detention and a reflection process was initiated on the adoption of domestic remedies for inadequate conditions of detention, however they are insufficient to disclose concrete progress in these areas;   RECALLING that the structural problems of overcrowding, inhuman and/or degrading conditions of detention and transportation and nutrition, and absence of a Convention-compliant system of domestic remedies thereof, have been pending before the Committee since 2005, without major progress reported so far;   NOTING that these deficiencies have serious humanitarian implications for those still in detention and put an additional undue burden on the Convention system, resulting in repetitive applications lodged with the Court on recurring problems of overcrowding and material conditions of detention, disclosing a widespread structural problem resulting from a malfunctioning of the Ukrainian penal system and insufficient safeguards against treatment proscribed by Article 3;   REITERATING that the obligation to abide by the judgments of the Court under Article   46 of the Convention and the principle of subsidiarity   which are   enshrined therein, entailed the obligation for the state, in context of the present cases, to find appropriate means to resolve the problem of inadequate conditions of detention and lack of effective domestic remedies thereof;   HAVING REGARD to the Court’s further indications under Article   46 in the pilot judgment in the case of Sukachov , that the Ukrainian authorities must take measures aimed at reducing overcrowding and improving material conditions of pre-trial detention and introduce preventive and compensatory remedies by 30 November 2021;   EXPRESSED DEEP REGRET about the lack of concrete progress in the implementation of the pilot judgment within the deadline set by the Court to this end;   RECALLING the absolute nature of the prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, enshrined in Article 3 of the Convention and the Court’s case-law;   STRONGLY URGED the authorities, at the highest political level, to overcome the current inertia and to hold to their commitment to resolve the problems of overcrowding and poor material conditions of detention and lack of effective remedies thereof and to adopt, as a matter of priority and without any further delay, the general measures required fully to comply with the pilot judgment;   ENCOURAGED the authorities to take full advantage of the technical assistance available from the Joint Project of the European Union and the Council of Europe in this area;   CALLED on the authorities to keep the Committee of Ministers informed in a timely manner of all developments and any progress made;   DECIDED to resume consideration of these groups of cases at their 1443 rd meeting (September 2022) (DH) at the latest.