CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 janvier 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-215668
- Date
- 17 janvier 2022
- Publication
- 17 janvier 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sD37F5C3B { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .sEC1E756B { height:55.75pt } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s773DED29 { height:336.9pt } Published on 7 February 2022   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 35564/19 Radovan KOMAR against Montenegro and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 17 January 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The present applicants lodged constitutional appeals on 30   January 2016, 1 February 2017 and 16 March 2018, respectively, complaining about the outcome of civil proceedings concerning their reputation and property-related claims. Relying on Article 6 they complain about the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court which appear to be still pending.   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court in the present cases in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article   6   §   1 of the Convention (see, for example, Oršuš and Others v. Croatia   [GC], no.   15766/03, §§ 108-10, 16   March 2010, s ee also   Siništaj   v. Montenegro [Committee], no. 31529/15, §§ 32-33, 23 September 2021)?   Appendix No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 35564/19 Komar v. Montenegro 14/05/2019 Radovan KOMAR 1951 Podgorica Montenegrin Nikola LAKOVIĆ 2. 48995/21 Lalićević v. Montenegro 24/09/2021 Gorica LALIĆEVIĆ 1985 Podgorica Montenegrin Duško LALIĆEVIĆ 3. 50021/21 Lalićević and Others v. Montenegro 01/10/2021 Ljiljana LALIĆEVIĆ 1956 Podgorica Montenegrin Branka TANASIJEVIĆ 1958 Nikšić Montenegrin Vjera VUKOVIĆ 1952 Nikšić Montenegrin Lenka DURUTOVIĆ 1954 Nikšić Montenegrin Sonja ŠĆEPOVIĆ 1957 Nikšić Montenegrin Duško LALIĆEVIĆ    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 17 janvier 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-215668
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel