CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 février 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 7 March 2022   THIRD SECTION Application no. 73585/14 Salikh Nabiyevich GADZHIYEV against Russia lodged on 14 November 2014 communicated on 17 February 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concern dismissal of the applicant from the police following his public statements about corruption in the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Dagestan, in particular, about “trading” of vacancies. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the criteria for assessing the proportionality of the interference under Article 10 of the Convention as set out in the Court’s case ‑ law (see, in particular, Heinisch v. Germany , no. 28274/08, ECHR   2011 (extracts); Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277/04, ECHR 2008; and Kudeshkina v. Russia , no. 29492/05, 26 February 2009), has there been a violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 10?