CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 9 mars 2022

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDD7C59DF { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s2E49B105 { background-color:#ffffff } .sC41F0EA6 { font-style:italic; background-color:#ffffff } .sDB80B9ED { margin-left:35.4pt; background-color:#ffffff } .s625422E3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s944BDE53 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)59 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 15 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 March 2022 at the 1428 th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 55060/07 BAYAR 13/06/2017 13/06/2017 9735/12 MEHDİ TANRIKULU 05/05/2020 05/08/2020 31605/12 CİN 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 32954/12 KÖK 02/07/2019 02/07/2019 76224/12 NECDET ATALAY 19/11/2019 15/04/2020 69270/12 ÖZER No. 3 11/02/2020 11/05/2020 77711/11 SÜER 29/09/2020 29/09/2020 3752/11 ARSLAN AND OTHERS 10/07/2018 10/07/2018 37048/97 NURETTİN DEMİRTAŞ 09/10/2003 09/10/2003 52497/08 ALİ GÜRBÜZ 12/03/2019 09/09/2019 66327/09 BALBAL 10/10/2017 10/10/2017 324/10 DEMİR 07/01/2020 07/01/2020 17606/11 AYATA CİVELEK AND OTHERS 13/10/2020 13/10/2020 41551/11 ALİ ABBAS YILMAZ 07/07/2020 07/07/2020 25119/11 CELAL ALTUN 23/06/2020 23/06/2020   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities’ unjustified interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, right to freedom of assembly (in the case of Ayata Civelek and Others ) due to the criminal proceedings initiated under various articles of the Criminal Code and Anti-Terrorism Law (violations of Article 10 and 11), and right to access to court (in the case of Bayar ) on account of   inadmissibility of the applicant’s appeal on points of law on grounds that level of fine was below statutory minimum for appeal (violations of Article 6) ;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligations;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2022)52 , DH-DD(2022)34 );   Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicants’ convictions have been quashed and their criminal records have been erased;   Recalling that the issue on the right to access to court in the case of Bayar has been closed by the Committee (see final resolution CM/ResDH(2019)330);   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the other shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Öner and Türk (51962/12), Altuğ Taner Akçam (27520/07), Nedim Şener (38270/11), Artun and Güvener (75510/01) and Işıkırık (41226/09) groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.