CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 9 mai 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s26138258 { margin-top:50pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC72D35A3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:18.15pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } Published on 30 May 2022   FIRST SECTION Application no. 22198/20 L.M. against Italy lodged on 8 June 2020 communicated on 9 May 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is affected by a psychiatric disorder and deaf-mutism. The application concerns both the alleged incompatibility of detention, between 19 September 2019 and 16 March 2021, with the applicant’s psychiatric disorder; and the lack of adequate assistance during detention in light of her deaf-mutism. Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant complains of the absence of adequate medical treatment and of the required assistance for her diseases. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a breach of the applicant’s rights under Article 3 of the Convention? In particular:   (a)     in light of the applicant’s psychiatric disorder, was the detention compatible with her state of health (see Epure v. Romania , no. 73731/17, §   74, 11 May 2021, Bamouhammad v. Belgium , no. 47687/13, §§ 120-21, 17 November 2015)? ./. (b)     did the applicant receive adequate medical treatment during her detention in prison (see Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no. 18052/11, §§   146-47, 31 January 2019, and Strazimiri v. Albania , no. 34602/16, §§ 103-12, 21   January 2020)?   (c)     did the applicant benefit from adequate assistance in detention with regard to her deaf-mutism (see Z.H. v.   Hungary , no.   28973/11, §§   30-33, 8   November 2012)?   2.     The Government are further invited to submit a copy of the applicant’s prison medical register ( diario   clinico ) along with a typewritten version.