CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 9 mai 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s65E06E64 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sC72D35A3 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:18.15pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Published on 30 May 2022   FIRST SECTION Application no. 38750/20 Angelo MURACA against Italy lodged on 25 August 2020 communicated on 9 May 2022   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged lack of adequate medical treatment in prison. In particular, relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant complains that the Italian authorities did not provide him with the required intervention aimed at the restoration of his dental implant.   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a breach of the applicant’s rights under Article 3 of the Convention? In particular, did the applicant receive adequate medical treatment during his detention in prison (see the principles set out by the Court in Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 136-37, 23 March 2016, and, mutatis mutandis , V.D. v. Romania , no. 7078/02, § 92-99, 16 February 2010)?