CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 octobre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s56836E3C { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s8C280A71 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Published on 7 November 2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 7120/20 Harun ÇİFTÇİ and Others against Türkiye and 2 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 19 October 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the non-execution of decisions delivered by the Yüksekova Labour Court, whereby the applicants were awarded compensation for their receivables arising from labour agreements with the Yüksekova Municipality. Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention the applicants complain about the continuing non-execution of the final judicial decisions awarding them compensation. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and their right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, on account of the authorities’ failure to execute the final judicial decisions delivered by the Yüksekova Civil Court (see Tetik and   others v. Turkey, no. 25885/19 and 37 others, 15 March 2022)?     List of Applications:   No App. No Applicant The Date of First Instance Court`s Decision The First ECHR`s Decision The Compensation Commission Decision The Date of First Execution Order The Date of TCC`s Decision 1. 7120/20 Harun Çiftçi and 9 others 17/07/2008, 28/09/2009 and 21/05/2010 No.78272/11, 17/09/2013 13/03/22014, 10.500 TRY 16/09/2008, 14/06/2010 and 06/08/2010 29/11/2018 2. 11231/20 Makbule Tınar and 6 others 28/09/2009 No. 509/12, 17/09/2013 10/02/2014, 10.000 TRY 05/06/2010 21/01/2019 3. 11235/20 Nazime Kömür and 7 others 17/07/2008,28/09/2009 and 21/05/2010 No. 7989/11, 17/09/2013 18/02/2014, 10.500 TRY 08/09/2008, 04/06/2010 and 12/07/2010