CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 novembre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 5 December 2022   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 51301/22 Karnchana WANGTHAN against Denmark lodged on 24 October 2022 communicated on 20 November 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a Thai national. She entered Denmark at the age of 37 with her two children. By a High Court judgment, which became final on 5   August 2022, the applicant was convicted of, inter alia, attempted assault with aggravating circumstances. She was sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment and ordered expelled from Denmark with a 6 ‑ year re ‑ entry ban. The applicant complained that the order expelling her from Denmark was in violation of Article 8 of the Convention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard, in particular, to the fact that the applicant was sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment, would the order to expel her from the country with a 6-year re-entry ban be in breach of Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Veljkovic-Jukic v. Switzerland , no. 59534/14, 21 July 2020)?