CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 janvier 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-223097
- Date
- 16 janvier 2023
- Publication
- 16 janvier 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Published on 6 February 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 10233/20 UKRKAVA, TOV against Ukraine lodged on 11 February 2020 communicated on 16 January 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns application of a provision of domestic law (first paragraph of Article 88 of Notary Act) by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in a manner that was allegedly unforeseeable and contrary to the principle of legal certainty. The applicant company raises this issue under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.   1. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicant company have a fair hearing in the determination of its civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, did the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, when adopting its decision of 2 July 2019, act foreseeably and in accordance with the principle of legal certainty?   2.     Has there been an interference with the applicant company’s peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1?   Has the applicant company been deprived or at risk of being deprived of its possessions in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and in accordance with the principles of international law, within the meaning of Article   1 of Protocol No.   1?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 16 janvier 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-223097
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel