CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 janvier 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-223227
- Date
- 24 janvier 2023
- Publication
- 24 janvier 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 13 February 2023   FIRST SECTION Application no. 76717/12 HABITAT SPA against Italy lodged on 22 November 2012 communicated on 24 January 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the compensation awarded to the applicant company for the expropriation of 1,818 square metres of its land in Bolzano. The applicant company complains, under Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, that the compensation awarded by the Trento Court of Appeal in its judgment of 5 December 2009 (and upheld by the Court of Cassation in 2012), which was calculated according to Section 8(3) of the Bolzano Province Law No. 10 of 15 April 1991, was considerably lower than the market value of the land. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant company been deprived of its possessions in the public interest, and in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1? Did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006 ‑ V)?)? In particular, was the compensation awarded under Section 8(3) of the Bolzano Province Law   No.   10 of 15 April 1991, as applicable at the relevant time, reasonably related to the market value of the property?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 24 janvier 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-223227
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel