CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 février 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 6 March 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no. 18138/20 Ronald HOGEMANN against the Netherlands lodged on 23 April 2020 communicated on 17 February 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant’s pre-trial detention, which lasted from 27 June 2019 to 18   December 2019, was based on the existence of a reasonable suspicion of stalking and a risk of reoffending. At the preparatory hearing held before the Midden-Nederland Regional Court on 8 October 2019, the applicant requested to have his pre-trial detention either lifted or suspended. The Regional Court dismissed this request. The applicant appealed against this decision in so far as it concerned the lifting of his pre-trial detention. On 30 October 2019 the Arnhem ‑ Leeuwarden Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and the applicant’s renewed request to have his pre-trial detention suspended. The applicant complains under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that the decisions of the Regional Court on 8 October 2019 and the Court of Appeal on 30 October 2019 had lacked sufficient reasons. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant’s pre-trial detention from 8 October 2019 until 18   December 2019 justified under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention? In particular, were the decisions of the Midden-Nederland Regional Court on 8   October 2019 and the Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal on 30 October 2019 sufficiently reasoned ( Clooth v. Belgium , 12   December 1991, §§   36-37 and 40, Series A no. 225, Zohlandt v. the Netherlands , no.   69491/16, §§   48 ‑ 54, 9   February 2021, and Hasselbaink v. the Netherlands , no.   73329/16, §§ 67-73, 9   February 2021)?