CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 10 mars 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-223966
- Date
- 10 mars 2023
- Publication
- 10 mars 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 27 March 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no.   41090/18 Andrey Igorevich RESIN against Russia and 6 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 10 March 2022, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 §   2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities which are the subject of well ‑ established case law of the Court (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.   27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Detention facility Period of detention Specific circumstances Other complaints under well-established case-law     41090/18* 17/08/2018 Andrey Igorevich RESIN 1974 Tatyana Robertovna Yesina Sevastopol IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 01/10/2017 – pending opposite-sex operators Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Multiple proceedings in various courts (Kirovskiy District Court of Khabarovsk, Industrialnyy District Court of Khabarovsk, Amursk Town Court of the Khabarovsk Region, Khabarovsk Regional Court, Kuybyshevskiy District Court of Irkutsk, Angarsk Town Court, Irkutsk Regional Court, Verkh-Isetskiy District Court of Yekaterinburg, Moscow City Court, First Appellate Court, Ninth Cassation Court, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation) between 16/01/2020 and 31/07/2020   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings     21641/19* 29/03/2019 Yevgeniy Viktorovich PROSVETOV 1976     IK-5 Vologda Region   IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 17/12/2015 – 13/10/2018   17/11/2018 – pending opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     58623/19* 06/12/2019 Petr Nikolayevich KOROLEV 1993     IK-31 Komi Republic 27/03/2021 – 06/08/2021   05/09/2021 – pending opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of conditions of detention during transport   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport: (1) van (0.2 m2 per inmate), train (0.4 m2 per inmate) on 27/03/2021 (8 hours), overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, insufficient number of sleeping places, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to toilet (2) train, van, on 06/08/2021 and 05/09/2021, 0,3 sq. m. per inmate, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light     18132/20 01/04/2020 Roman Yuryevich IGNATOV 1989     IK-25 Komi Republic 15/11/2017 – pending opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by van and train, form 01/12/2019 to 02/12/2019; overcrowding (0.4 to 0.5   sq.m.), insufficient number of sleeping places, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen; no or restricted access to toilet, lack of privacy for toilet; no or restricted access to potable water, inadequate temperature     33775/20* 17/07/2020 Nikolay Vladimirovich MOROZOV 1986     IK-25 Komi Republic 18/01/2016 – pending opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention and in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - IK-25 Komi Region, since 01/01/2016, personal space less than 1   sq.m, detained with 40 inmates     15112/21* 25/02/2021 Aleksey Sergeyevich SHATALOV 1983     IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 09/12/2017 – pending video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings and in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention - The applicant is a lifer; he complains about lack of access to natural light, unavailability of natural or forced ventilation, absence of warm water in the cell, to which he is confined 22.5   hours per day. The cell measure 6   sq.m. and houses 2   inmates   Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - On multiple occasions between 06/03/2019 and 19/01/2021, the applicant was placed in a metal case when participating in civil proceedings by means of a video link; Prokhladnenskiy District Court; Stavropol Regional Court; Oktyabrskiy District Court; Pyatigorsk Town Court     15727/21* 22/01/2021 Oleg Nikolayevich VESELENKO 1977     LIU-37 Krasnoyarsk Region, brigade no.   4 03/08/2020 – 07/05/2021 opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport - and in respect of permanent video surveillance in LIU-37, Krasnoyarsk Region   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Since 17/10/2020; transfers from the correctional colony to a farm and back (work); six times per week, van, 6   sq.m. (two compartments measuring 6   sq.m. in total, housing from   28 to 45   persons. No heating, while the outside temperature was below 30   degrees  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 10 mars 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-223966
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel