CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mai 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } Published on 30 May 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no.   65015/19 Konstantin Andreyevich BUZIN against Russia and 20 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 May 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin v.   Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings)   No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Other complaints under well-established case-law     65015/19 05/12/2019 Konstantin Andreyevich BUZIN 1978     fine of RUB 15,000 28/08/2019, Moscow City Court       27436/21* 27/04/2021 Denis Vladimirovich VASILENKO 1989 Aleksey Valeryevich Vlasov Tula administrative detention of 3   days   administrative detention of 8   days 27/10/2020, Tula Regional Court   20/10/2021, Tula Regional Court       29209/21* 17/05/2021 German Aleksandrovich KOBYCHEV 1998 Konstantin Aleksandrovich Markin Velikiy Novgorod fine of RUB 5,000   19/11/2020,   Tsentralnyy District Court of Sochi Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     1430/22 14/12/2021 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich TOPOROV 1989     fine of RUB 30,000 suspension of driving licence   for 1 year 6 months 13/09/2021, Isakogorskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk       3175/22* 24/12/2021 Sergey Vladimirovich GORLOV 1978 Valeriy Viktorovich Kanayev Diveyevo   fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence for 1 year 6 months 27/07/2021, Ardatovskiy District Court of the Nizhniy Novgorod Region       3507/22* 22/12/2021 Andrey Yuryevich PODKIDYSHEV 1960 Andrey Yevgenyevcich Shchukin Nizhniy Tagil fine of RUB 2,000 administrative detention of 12 days 25/11/2021,   Sverdlovsk Regional Court   03/03/2022, Sverdlovsk Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 18/11/2021, detention in excess of 3 hours (see Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, § 34, 8 October 2019)     4501/22* 10/01/2022 Dmitriy Olegovich MOREV 2001 Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov Vilnius fine of RUB 10,000 31/08/2021,   Voronezh Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,   Art. 6 (1) and Art. 6 (3) (d) – unfair criminal proceedings in view of the impossibility to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     16125/22* 26/02/2022 Vasiliy Aleksandrovich KOCHKIN 1988 Valeriy Viktorovich Kanayev Diveyevo fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence 15/02/2022,   Diveyevskiy District Court of the Nizhniy Novgorod Region       24461/22* 05/03/2022 Ruslan Gennadyevich OVSYANNIKOV 1983     fine of RUB 1,000 02/11/2021, Saratov Regional Court     29895/22* 06/05/2022 Sergey Vladimirovich SHESHENIN 1970 Valeriy Viktorovich Kanayev Diveyevo fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence   for 1 year and 6 months 26/04/2022,   Diveyevskiy District Court of the Nizhniy Novgorod Region Art. 6 (3) (c) - free legal assistance - the applicant was not provided with free legal assistance before and during a trial against him (see Mikhaylova v. Russia, no. 46998/08, §§ 76-84, 19 November 2015)   30994/22* 08/06/2022 Aleksandr Anatolyevich PRIKHOZHDENKO 1993 Timofey Borisovich Ushakov Kokoshkino fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence   for 1 year 6 months 09/12/2021, Moscow City Court     32764/22* 11/06/2022 Aleksandr Anatolyevich RYBKOV 1974 Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk suspension of driving licence for 1 year 21/01/2022, Shchelkovskiy District Court of the Moscow Region Art. 6 (3) (c) - free legal assistance - lack of legal assistance in administrative proceedings against the applicant   34291/22* 30/06/2022 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich AKIMOV 1995 Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Ushakov Kokoshkno fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence for 1 year 02/03/2022, Butyrskiy District Court of Moscow     36331/22 18/07/2022 Grigoriy Vladimirovich ALEYNIKOV 1988 Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo Barnaul administrative detention of 10 days 21/03/2022, St Petersburg City Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 27/02/2022 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, released on the following day,   Art. 6 (1) and Art. 6 (3) (d) – unfair criminal proceedings in view of the impossibility to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 16/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (see Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia., §§ 179-191; Martynyuk v. Russia, paras 38-42)   38591/22* 07/07/2022 Mariya Vladimirovna KRIVENKO 1989 Irina Vladimirovna Gak Rostov-on-Don administrative detention of 10 days   11/03/2022,   Rostov Regional Court Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - arrest and detention on 06/03/2022 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, the applicant was released on the following day,   Art. 6 (1) and Art. 6 (3) (d) – unfair criminal proceedings in view of the impossibility to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based and to submit evidence, including video recordings, in defence of the applicant’s version of events on an equal footing with the prosecution.   Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 07/03/2022 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO (see Tsvetkova and Others v Russia, §§ 179-191)   38786/22* 25/07/2022 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich GONCHARUK 1981     fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence for 1 year and 6 months 25/01/2022, Bureyskiy District Court of the Amur Region     39360/22* 22/07/2022 Viktor Yevgenyevich YASINOVSKIY 1989 Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence for 1 year and 8 months 19/05/2022, Bazarno-Karabulakskiy District Court of the Saratov Region Art. 6 (3) (c) - free legal assistance - the applicant was not provided with free legal assistance during his arrest and while the police were drawing up the administrative-offence report on 08/12/2021   39365/22* 22/07/2022 Andrey Viktorovich GALKIN 1983 Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence for 1 year and 7 months 18/04/2022, Volsk District Court of the Saratov Region Art. 6 (3) (c) - free legal assistance - the applicant complained that he had been deprived of free legal assistance during his arrest and while the police were drawing up the administrative offence report   45216/22 05/09/2022 Anastasiya Yevgenyevna AGEYEVA 1998 Vladimir Sergeyevich Nemanov Moscow administrative detention of 15 days 05/05/2022 Moscow City Court Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in open court police officer on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based,   Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention on   29-30/04/2022 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence.   50884/22* 15/10/2022 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich BOBOSHKO 1985     fine of RUB 30,000, suspension of driving licence for 1 year and 7 months 12/07/2022, Volsk District Court of the Saratov Region     1412/23* 22/12/2022 Nikolay Aleksandrovich TISHKIN 1985 Aleksey Borisovich Vologin Volsk fine of RUB, 30,000; suspension of driving license for 1 year and 6 months 15/09/2022, Military Court of the Central Circuit