CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mai 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3A357E38 { text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .s1DE04BC { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:8pt } Published on 30 May 2023   THIRD SECTION Application no.   36904/19 Aleksandr Nikolayevich BUTYANOV against Russia and 36 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 May 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention relating to deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 161-65, 22   May 2012, Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, §§ 219-48, 31 May 2011 and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 75-115, 25 October 2007).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (deficiencies in proceedings for review of the lawfulness of detention) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location First-instance court and date of detention order Appeal instance court and date of decision Procedural deficiencies Other complaints under well-established case-law     36904/19* 04/07/2019 Aleksandr Nikolayevich BUTYANOV 1980           Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 13/01/2021   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 19/05/2021   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 27/07/2021   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 19/10/2021 Fifth Appellate Court, 26/02/2021     Fifth Appellate Court, 24/06/2021     Fifth Appellate Court, 08/09/2021     Fifth Appellate Court, 26/11/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Placement of the applicant in a metal cage during the hearing in the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court on 19/05/2021,   Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - Nizhneingashskiy District Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, Fifth Appellate Court, pending since 23/10/2020, murder and weapon trafficking, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; persistent reliance, as the case progressed, on charges concerning membership of an organised criminal group,   Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention     20809/21* 17/03/2021 Dmitriy Vladimirovich GUKOV 1985     Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 29/12/2020   Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 05/02/2020 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 26/01/2021     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 18/02/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§   154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 29/12/2020-10/03/2021,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings     23768/21* 05/08/2021 Anton Indusovich GABITOV 1988     Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 02/03/2021, appeal lodged on 12/03/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 08/04/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)       24513/21* 27/12/2021 Vitaliy Sergeyevich MATERKIN 1991     Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 22/09/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 28/10/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)       33095/21* 09/06/2021 Maksim Anatolyevich DOLGODVOROV 1982     Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 12/03/2021 Second Appellate Court of General Jurisdiction, 19/04/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention – detention since 18/08/2016 – ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court. Lomonosovskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk Regional Court; Last appeal - 12/03/2021. Specific defects: fragility of the reasons employed by the courts as the case progressed; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice,   Art. 8 (1) - permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities - in SIZO-4, Arkhangelsk Region, since 19/08/2016 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court: opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, detention in different cells with video surveillance,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of inadequate conditions of detention,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention - The applicant is in pre-trial detention in SIZO-4, Arkhangelsk Region, since 19/08/2016. He complains of the following grievances: sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, overcrowding (< 2 sq. m. per person), passive smoking, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of or insufficient natural light, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of heating, absence of warm water, inadequate temperature, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient quantity of food, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of fresh air,   Art. 8 (1) - restrictions on family visits in pre-trial facilities - Refusal of long-term family visits,   Art. 14 - in conjunction with Art. 8 - discriminatory treatment compared with convicted prisoners as regards duration of short-term family visits and absence of long-term family visits,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - Between 19/08/2016 and 01/10/2021 the applicant was transported on numerous occasions (more than 600 times), each of the trips took 45 minutes and more, overcrowding (there were at least 14 detainees in a van each time), some people smoked during transportation, there were no safety belts or handles     36485/21* 23/06/2021 Shamil Eduardovich NIGMATZYANOV 1991     Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 29/04/2021, appeal lodged on 30/04/2021 Fourth Appellate Court 03/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)       40042/21 13/07/2021 Timur Narimanovich NUTSALOV 1994     Cheremushkinsky District Court of Moscow, 14/04/2021, appeal lodged on 15/04/2021 Moscow City Court, 27/05/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)       44915/21 03/10/2021 Aleksandr Viktorovich GERASIMOV 1984     Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 22/06/2021   Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 16/09/2021   Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 24/12/2021 Second Appeal Court, 12/08/2021   Second Appeal Court, 21/10/2021     Second Appeal Court, 03/02/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)       48431/21 27/08/2021 Natig Agalar Ogly ISKANDAROV 1977     Vakhitovskiy District Court of Kazan, 04/05/2021 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 28/05/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     48973/21 15/09/2021 Georgiy Nikolayevich ZHAVORONKOV 1956 Vadim Tikhonovich Sivchenko Korolev Babushkinskiy District Court of Moscow, 04/02/2021, appeal lodged on 08/02/2021   Babushkinskiy District Court of Moscow, 31/03/2021, appeal lodged on 05/04/2021 Moscow City Court, 23/03/2021           Moscow City Court, 10/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     49774/21* 24/09/2021 Vadim Leonidovich LITVINOV 1968 Kseniya Yevgenyevna Bezrukova Moscow Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, 13/05/2021, appeal lodged on 18/05/2021 Moscow City Court, 07/07/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     50115/21* 29/09/2021 Yuriy Edisherovich SHONIYA 1982     Krasnoselskiy District Court of   St Petersburg, 30/04/2021 St Petersburg City Court, 07/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     51000/21 29/09/2021 Anatoliy Yuryevich GOLOVKO 1987     Lomonosov District Court of Arkhangelsk, 13/07/2021 Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 04/08/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - Velskiy District Court of the Arkhangelsk Region, Arkhangelsk Regional Court, detention since 16/11/2021, accused of kidnapping, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice   53763/21* 22/10/2021 Sergey Alekseyevich VNUKOV 1974 Vladimir Anatolyevich Brigadin Moscow Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, 31/03/2021   Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, 01/07/2021 Moscow City Court, 24/05/2021     Moscow City Court, 16/08/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - Tverskoy District Court of Moscow, Moscow City Court, detention since 04/02/2021, accused of fraud, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the courts as the case progressed   59342/21* 18/11/2021 Valeriy Igorevich NIKOLAYEV 1990     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 25/03/2021 Fifth Appellate Court of General Jurisdiction, 20/05/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the violation of Article 5 §   4 of the Convention   59939/21* 11/11/2021 Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZLUTSEV 1994     Sukhobuzimskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk Region, 01/04/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 13/05/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Sukhobuzimskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court; 07/03/2019-04/06/2021,   Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - between 05/03/2019 and 12/05/2020 (the first conviction, reversed on appeal on 10/09/2020 by the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court) and between 10/09/2020 and 04/06/2021; Defects: use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the courts as the case progressed; failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during the period of detention,   Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate, compensation for unlawful arrest or detention - in respect of the alleged violations of Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention,   Art. 6 (3) (c) - free legal assistance - inability to have confidential exchanges with legal counsel during the trial due to his placement in a metal cage, in particular, due to the permanent presence of escort officers near the metal cage and their inspection and reading of all the written communications passed by the applicant, confined in the metal cage, to his legal counsel (raised in appeal)   61034/21 26/11/2021 Aleksey Nikolayevich DUDOCHKIN 1991 Natalya Valeryevna Pavlova Zelenogorsk Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 21/04/2021, appeal lodged on 26/04/2021   Sovetskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 13/05/2021, appeal lodged on 17/05/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 28/05/2021         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 22/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the violation of Article 5 §   4 of the Convention   917/22* 22/12/2021 Anatoliy Petrovich BYKOV 1960 Oksana Vladimirovna Preobrazhenskaya Strasbourg Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 15/06/2021, appeal lodged on 17/06/2021,   Zheleznodorozhniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 16/06/2021, appeal lodged on 17/06/2021,   Zheleznodorozhniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 18/08/2021, appeal lodged on 22/08/2021,   Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 06/10/2021, appeal lodged on 13/10/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 13/07/2021         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 29/07/2021         Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 21/09/2021         Fifth Appellate Court, 12/11/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention (Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the violation of Article 5 §   4 of the Convention,   Prot. 1 Art. 3 - ineligibility to vote in or stand for elections   1085/22* 18/12/2021 Yuriy Pavlovich ARTOKHIN 1986 Olga Viktorovna Golub Suzemka Tushinskiy District Court of Moscow, 17/05/2021 Moscow City Court, 22/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     1547/22 22/12/2021 Kirill Sergeyevich KONSTANTINOV 1988 Dmitriy Igorevich Zakhvatov Moscow Dorogomilevskiy District Court of Moscow 22/05/2021 Moscow City Court 22/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrested at 12.30 on 19/05/2021, recorded at 9 p.m. on 20/05/2021; raised in detention proceedings (see Fortalnov and Others v. Russia , nos. 7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 76-79, 26 June 2018)   2112/22* 23/11/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich SOBORNOV 1979     Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 04/05/2021   Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 03/08/2021   Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 01/09/2021,   Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 30/09/2021 Fourth Appellate Court, 23/06/2021       Fourth Appellate Court, 25/08/2021       Fourth Appellate Court, 15/09/2021,     Fourth Appellate Court, 22/10/2021   lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, Fourth Appellate Court, detention period to be examined is after 21/07/2022 (the detention period before 21/07/2022 was already found to violate Art. 5-3 of the Convention), extortion, economic crime, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the courts as the case progressed; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding   3558/22* 01/12/2021 Rustem Vyacheslavovich FETISOV 1989     Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, 14/05/2021 The Fourth Appeal Court of General Jurisdiction, 11/06/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention – detention since 24/03/2020, drug offence, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; fragility and repetitiveness of the reasoning employed by the courts as the case progressed; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding   4511/22* 21/12/2021 Maksim Pavlovich YEMELYANOV 1981     Sovetskiy District Court of Kazan, 07/06/2021   Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 23/07/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     5361/22 29/12/2021 Dmitriy sergeyevich LAMANOV 1992 Leonid Alekseyevich Solovyev Moscow Nadym Town Court, 18/09/2021     Basmannyy District Court of Moscow, 09/11/2021 Yamalo-Neninsk Regional Court, 14/10/2021   Moscow City Court, 14/12/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - pre-trial detention since 16/09/2021, calls to unauthorised manifestation, Nadym Town Court of the Yamalo-Nenetsk Region, Yamalo-Nenetsk Regional Court, Basmannyy District Court of Moscow, Moscow City Court, fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding   6211/22* 27/12/2021 Vadim Vladimirovich SHVETS 1974     Nevskiy District Court of St Petersburg, 13/05/2021 St Petersburg City Court, 21/10/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     7052/22* 03/01/2022 Roman Aleksandrovich KARETNIKOV 1986     Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 16/09/2021   Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 24/12/2021   Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 22/06/2021 Second Appellate Court, 14/10/2021     Second Appellate Court, 09/02/2022     Second Appellate Court, 28/07/2021   lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - The applicant’s placement in a glass cabin during the hearings in the Arkhangelsk Regional Court, since 25/01/2017; six persons per cabin measuring 3.6 sq. m,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van, transit cell, since 25/01/2017 and ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court, 0.32 sq. m., applicant transported on numerous occasions, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, overcrowding, inadequate temperature,   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of the applicant’s placement in a glass cabin during the hearings and in respect of his conditions of transport   8843/22 27/01/2022 Ilkin Elshanovich SALIMOV 1994     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 24/06/2021, appeal lodged on 28/06/2021 Fifth Appellate Court, 28/07/2021   lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention   9341/22* 22/01/2022 Farrukh Dilmurodovich TULAYEV 1989 Pavel Markovich Pliskin St Petersburg Nevskiy District Court of St Petersburg, 30/06/2021 St Petersburg City Court, 22/07/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     9500/22 18/01/2022 Yevgeniy Olegovich PALAMARCHUK 1996     Zelenodolsk Town Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 07/07/2021, appeal lodged on 08/07/2021 and 12/07/2021 Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic, 17/09/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     11164/22 07/02/2022 Artur Aleksandrovich KUPREISHVILI 1989     Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 16/09/2021, appeal lodged on 26/12/2021 Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 24/12/2021, appeal lodged on 17/09/2021 Second Appellate Court, 14/10/2021       Second Appellate Court, 03/02/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     11172/22 03/02/2022 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich BOGDANOV 1980     Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 16/09/2021   Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 24/12/2021 Second Appellate Court, 21/10/2021     Second Appellate Court, 03/02/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention – detention since 2016 – ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court. Lomonosovskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk Regional Court; Specific defects: fragility of the reasons employed by the courts as the case progressed; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice   11781/22 14/02/2022 Mikhail Yuryevich DUDOCHKIN 1984 Denis Aleksandrovich Timchenko Moscow Zheleznogorskiy Town Court of the Krasnoyarsk Region, 12/10/2021, appeal lodged on 13/10/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 16/12/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     14873/22* 21/02/2022 Andrey Nikolayevich KOLPAKOV 1976 Vitaliy Sergeyevich Gurenko Krasnoyarsk Eniseyskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 24/11/2021   Eniseyskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, 19/12/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 21/12/2021     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 20/01/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - use of metal cage since 24/11/2021 in Eniseyskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court     19613/22 08/03/2022 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich DANILOV 1985     Arkhangelsk Regional Court, 24/12/2021 Second Appellate Court, 03/02/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     25042/22* 28/04/2022 Timur Magomedrasulovich MAGOMEDOV 1984 Pavel Markovich Pliskin St Petersburg Krasnogvardeyskiy District Court of St Peterburg, 01/10/2021   Krasnogvardeyskiy District Court of St Peterburg, 13/10/2021 St Petersburg City Court, 28/10/2021       St Petersburg City Court, 03/12/2021 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012)     27726/22* 27/05/2022 Aleksey Olegovich ZADUMIN 1972 Aleksandr Vladimirovich Kukharev Moscow Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow 04/02/2022, appeal sent by post on 07/02/2022, delivered to the District Court on 09/02/2022 Moscow City Court, 09/03/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - The applicant’s placement in a metal cage during the hearing in the Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow on 27/04/2022,   Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow, Moscow City Court, detention since 02/02/2022, economic crime; fragility of the reasons employed by the courts; failure to assess the applicant’s personal situation reducing the risks of re-offending, colluding or absconding; use of assumptions, in the absence of any evidentiary basis, of the risks of absconding or obstructing justice   30057/22 06/06/2022 Viktor Vyacheslavovich KRYSOV 2000     Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 02/02/2022 Fifth Appellate Court, 11/03/2022 lack of speediness of review of detention ( Idalov v.   Russia [GC], no.   5826/03, §§ 154-158, 22 May 2012) Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - Krasnoyarsk Regional Court, 02/02/2022,   Art. 5 (5) - lack of, or inadequate compensation, for the violation of Article   5 § 4 of the Convention