CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 26 avril 2023

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s39E5096F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Published on 15 May 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application nos. 10789/18 and 3339/23 Petro Ivanovych YAKOVETS against Ukraine and Yuriy Yuriyovych RYASKA against Ukraine lodged on 12 February 2018 and 29 December 2022 respectively communicated on 26 April 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the applicants’ complaint about the alleged failure of the State to enforce the final judgments issued in their favour, ordering the relevant State authorities to perform certain actions (see Appendix). The applicants relied on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Do the present cases fall within the category of cases for which it is justified, in accordance with the Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Burmych and Others v. Ukraine ((striking out) [GC], nos. 46852/13 et al., 12   October 2017) , to be struck out of the list of cases and transferred for processing to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe?   2.     If not, was the failure of the respective State authorities to comply with the judgments (see Appendix), given in the applicants’ favour, compatible with the applicants’ rights guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 6, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?   APPENDIX List of cases No. Application no. and date of introduction Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Relevant domestic judgment Action to be performed 1. 10789/18 12/02/2018 Petro Ivanovych YAKOVETS 1949 Uzhgorod Kyiv Circuit Administrative Court, 16 July 2013 Reinstatement of the applicant in the post of a Deputy Head of the State Plant Quarantine Inspection in Zakarpattia Region. 2. 3339/23 29/12/2022 Yuriy Yuriyovych RYASKA 1960 Beregove Zakarpattya region Berehivskyi District Court of Zakarpattia Region, 20 January 2009 The court obliged the civil servants of the Berehivskyi Interdistrict Department for Water Management to carry out an investigation into the reasons for occurrence of the applicant’s professional illness.