CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 mai 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-224970
- Date
- 4 mai 2023
- Publication
- 4 mai 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s34DFC730 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s54AB6003 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sE7C30868 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s2D9C6089 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sDF237D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:8pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s14D0E8B1 { height:41.1pt } .sA15DE78A { height:17.1pt } .sADAB756B { height:56.55pt } .s10974627 { height:67.7pt } Published on 30 May 2023   FIFTH SECTION Application no.   47699/19 Artem Kamilyevich KHATYPOV against Russia and 25 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 4 May 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia. In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention. In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website . SUBJECT MATTER The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities which are the subject of well ‑ established case law of the Court (see Gorlov and Others v. Russia, nos.   27057/06 and 2 others, 2 July 2019).   APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (permanent video surveillance of detainees in pre-trial or post-conviction detention facilities) No. Application no. Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Detention facility Period of detention Specific circumstances Other complaints under well-established case-law     47699/19 08/08/2019 Artem Kamilyevich KHATYPOV 1990 SIZO-1 Komi Republic,   IK-1 Komi Republic 06/05/2021 - 15/07/2021   11/11/2020 - 11/02/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of placement in a metal cage during court hearings   Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - on 24/05/2021 the applicant was placed in a metal cage while he participated in a court hearing by means of a video link (the complaint was introduced on 08/06/2021)   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of detention during transport by vans, trains on several occasions between 14/06/2019-06/08/2020: insufficient number of sleeping places, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet     34096/20* 04/06/2021 Dzharakhudzha Safarkhudzhayevich ABDULLOYEV 1987 IK-42 Krasnoyarsk Region 11/04/2019-18/02/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     44448/20* 05/10/2020 Artem Dmitriyevich PASICHENKO 1997 SIZO-1 St   Petersburg 16/07/2020 - 16/01/2021 opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport by train from Bryansk to St Petersburg from 29 to 30/06/2020; lack or insufficient quality of food; in the letter received by the Court on 16/03/2021 the applicant. complains about transport on 16/01/2021 (St Petersburg - Vologda by train), 27/01/2021 (Vologda - Kirov by train), 06/02/2021 (2 hours in a van and Kirov - Yekaterinburg by train) raising overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of heating and ventilation     Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage during court hearings at 224th Garrison Military Court during 30/06/2020 - 11/08/2020     47007/20 17/03/2021 Dmitriy Viktorovich LEBEDINTSEV 1975 IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 19/02/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators       52653/20* 11/01/2021 Sergey Nikolayevich BUSHMANOV 1984 IZ-1 St Petersburg, psychiatric hospital no. 6 of St Petersburg 25/03/2020 - 02/09/2020; 02/09/2020 - 30/09/2020; 30/09/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - detention in a metal cage in the hearings from the Vyborgskiy District Court of St   Petersburg between 25/03/2020 and 18/11/2020   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of placement in metal cage   Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - from 23/03/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged (latest statement of appeal submitted was lodged on 25/09/2020)     55752/20 14/01/2021 Timur Amrailovich ALLAKHVERDIYEV 1991 IK-31 Komi Republic 20/04/2020-20/02/2021 opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities.     9356/21 19/07/2021 Aleksey Vladimirovich TASKIN 1985 IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region 29/06/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged   opposite-sex operators Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention after conviction - IK-5 Krasnoyarsk Region, form 29/06/2016 to 17/03/2021, personal space 3.33 sq. m, 170 inmates in a brigade, 5 toilets, bunk beds, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower, overcrowding   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of inadequate conditions during transport   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van, on numerous occasions from 17/03/2021 to 12/04/2021, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to potable water, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet     22252/21* 14/04/2021 Artur Rafikovich RAGIMOV 1986 IK-18 Yamalo-Nenetsk Region, IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 17/11/2006 -ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities     30954/21 14/05/2021 Shakhban Sultanovich GERIMSULTANOV 1971 IK-25 Komi Republic 01/01/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   30974/21* 14/05/2021 Abdurauf Ravshanovich SUVANOV 1990 IK-25 Komi Republic 16/09/2020 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   30976/21 10/05/2021 Narkuzi Abdusattarovich ANARKULOV 1976 IK-25 Komi Republic 01/06/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   31272/21 26/05/2021 Asliddin Talabshoyevich NAZAROV 1988 IK-25 Komi Republic 2010 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   31584/21 24/07/2021 Oleg Yuryevich BOCHAROV 1981 IK-49 Komi Republic 18/08/2016 - 01/11/2021 opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   32736/21* 28/05/2021 Aleksey Viktorovich BOGDANOV 1974 IK-6 Khabarovsk Region 26/06/2019 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 3 - use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms - placement in a metal cage during the hearings (via video-link) in Sol-Iletskiy and Leninskiy District Courts of Orenburg from 04/02/2021 to 15/07/2021     Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   34147/21* 20/08/2021 Kirill Gennadyevich PERMINOV 1992 IK-25 Komi Republic 21/05/2018-ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room     43124/21 22/04/2021 Stanislav Olegovich MARTYNENKO 1984 IK-25 Komi Republic 18/12/2019 – ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, detention in different cells with video surveillance Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   43535/21 09/08/2021 Vitaliy Gennadyevich SHMONIN 1987 IK-19 Komi Republic 09/08/2021 - ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room     43732/21 11/08/2021 Aleksandr Nikolayevich MILEKHIN 1995 IK-25 Komi Republic 17/12/2017 ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, disciplinary cells Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   43749/21 06/08/2021 Vitaliy Yuryevich SAFONOV 1982 IK-49 Komi Republic 02/03/2017 ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   43899/21* 11/08/2021 Arayk Ashotovich TARPOSHYAN 1987 IK-25 Komi Republic 15/04/2018 - 27/03/2021 detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   10311/22* 18/03/2022 Sergey Nikolayevich MIGUNOV 1973 FKU Tyurma Krasnoyarsk Region 08/10/2021-ongoing on the date when the application was lodged opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   10647/22* 01/02/2022 Vadim Mikhaylovich ROZANOV 1977 SIZO-1 St   Petersburg 18/05/2021 - 05/01/2022 video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities and in respect of the inadequate conditions during transport     Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - multiple transfers between the remand prison and the courthouse between 15/05/2021 and 06/12/2021 in an overcrowded van. Transfers lasted 2 to 4 hours   10679/22 25/01/2022 Gamzat Umarovich ABDUSAMADOV 1991 IK-31 Komi Republic 11/05/2017-25/01/2022 opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   11652/22 16/02/2022 Vasiliy Alekseyevich FRANCHUK 1987 IK-29 Kirov Region October 2020 - September 2021 opposite-sex operators, video surveillance in a lavatory and/or shower room Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   11736/22 16/02/2022 Mikhail Andreyevich SEMYKIN 1990 IK-29 Kirov Region 03/08/2017-ongoing on the date when the application was lodged detention in different cells with video surveillance, opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities   13219/22* 09/02/2022 Oleg Olegovich LYUSHENKO 1988 IVS Vyshny Volochyok, SIZO-1 Tver Region, SIZO-1 Yaroslavl 10/12/2019 - 08/11/2021 opposite-sex operators Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 4 mai 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-224970
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel