CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 mai 2023
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-225261
- Date
- 15 mai 2023
- Publication
- 15 mai 2023
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 5 June 2023   FIRST SECTION Application no. 30483/22 Štefan ŽIGA against Slovakia lodged on 10 June 2022 communicated on 15 May 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s pre-trial detention ordered in the context of criminal proceedings against him for aggravated bribery, on the grounds of risk of collusion and reoffending (Article 71 § 1 b) and   c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure). The applicant’s detention could last five months at maximum. The applicant, relying on Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, claims that his detention was unlawful, the domestic courts having failed to give sufficient reasons regarding the risk of collusion and reoffending which constituted the legal basis of his detention under the Code of Criminal Procedure. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was his detention compatible with Article   5 §   1   (c) in terms of being justified and based on a reasonable suspicion (see, among many other authorities, Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan , nos.63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 113-30, 13 February 2020)?   2.     Was the applicant’s pre-trial detention ordered “in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law”, for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention?   3.     The parties are requested to submit copies of all documents relating to the institution of the criminal proceedings against the applicant and the proceedings concerning his pre-trial detention.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 15 mai 2023
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-225261
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel